GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6 Sol
Compare GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6 Sol side-by-side.
Compare GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6 Sol live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.
Models in this comparison
GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6 Sol on Vision Evals
GPT-6 Sol scores higher on 5 of the six Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Object Detection, where GPT-6 Sol leads 73.6% to 15.8%.
Overall, GPT-5.4 Mini averages 64.7% (#42 of 57) against 80.7% (#10 of 57) for GPT-6 Sol.
GPT-5.4 Mini is both cheaper ($0.0030 vs $0.0065 per sample) and faster (5.3s vs 8.1s per sample).
GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6 Sol Comparison Table
Evals updated September 22, 2026Pricing updated September 22, 2026
| Property | GPT-5.4 Mini | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Mar 2026 | Sep 2026 |
| Context Window | 400K | 1.1M |
| Parameters | undisclosed | |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.750 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $4.50 | $10.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | |
| OCR | Demo | |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 64.7% | 80.7% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0030 | $0.0065 |
| Avg speed / sample | 5.25s | 8.15s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 15.8% ±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 15.3 to 16.1 | 73.6% ±0.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 72.9 to 74.2 |
| Object Detection (high) | 16.6% ±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 15.8 to 17.4 | 75.2% ±0.9, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.1 to 75.9 |
| Counting (low) | 58.6% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 56.8 to 60.8 | 74.8% ±2.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.6 to 77.0 |
| Counting (high) | 64.9% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.5 to 67.6 | 76.1% ±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.6 to 78.4 |
| Identification (low) | 83.3% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4 | 91.7% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 93.8 |
| Identification (high) | 82.3% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 84.4 | 92.7% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8 |
| OCR (low) | 89.5% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 88.1 to 90.6 | 91.7% ±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 91.3 to 92.1 |
| OCR (high) | 89.0% ±1.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.7 to 91.2 | 91.9% ±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 91.6 to 92.2 |
| Data Extraction (low) | 84.2% ±2.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.5 to 86.6 | 80.4% ±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.4 to 80.4 |
| Data Extraction (high) | 82.1% ±2.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.4 to 84.5 | 82.5% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.4 to 83.5 |
| Reasoning (low) | 57.0% ±3.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.3 to 60.9 | 72.2% ±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 70.9 to 74.2 |
| Reasoning (high) | 64.0% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.9 to 65.6 | 77.9% ±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.5 to 80.8 |
GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6 Sol: Overview
GPT-5.4 mini is a fast, cost-efficient model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, optimized for high-throughput workloads and subagent orchestration. It supports text and image inputs within a 400,000-token context window, making it ideal for processing extensive visual datasets and large codebases in a single request. Designed for low-latency production environments, the model integrates with key API features including function calling, web search, and tool-based computer use, allowing it to assist in automated workflows that require navigating digital interfaces.
Compared to the previous GPT-5 mini, this version runs more than twice as fast while approaching the performance levels of the flagship GPT-5.4 on reasoning and coding benchmarks. While the larger GPT-5.4 introduces native, state-of-the-art computer-use capabilities, GPT-5.4 mini provides a scalable alternative for interpreting screenshots and reasoning over dense UI layouts. For vision tasks on Playground, it excels at extracting structured information from visual documents and assisting in agentic tasks that involve real-time interpretation of software interfaces alongside text.
GPT-6 Sol is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from OpenAI, released on September 22, 2026 alongside GPT-6 Luna as an efficiency-oriented tier of the GPT-6 family that began with GPT-6 Astra. OpenAI states that Sol and Luna are trained with methods similar to those used for Astra, carrying the same work on professional tasks, factuality, coding, computer use, and alignment into models that run faster. Sol accepts text and image input and returns text output, and OpenAI documents a context window of roughly one million tokens together with a knowledge cutoff of April 20, 2026.
The model targets complex coding and agentic workflows and exposes a configurable reasoning effort setting with levels of none, low, medium, high, xhigh, and max, which trades latency and token consumption against answer quality. OpenAI reports results including 33.2% on AutomationBench at xhigh effort and 56.4% on Agents' Last Exam at max effort, while its reported DeepSWE and OSWorld 2.0 figures of 68.8% and 64.4% fall below those of the earlier GPT-5.6 Sol. Its vision behavior covers image understanding tasks such as visual question answering, captioning, document and chart interpretation, and text recognition.
Frequently Asked Questions
On Roboflow's Vision Evals, GPT-6 Sol performed better. It scores higher on 5 of the six vision tasks and averages 80.7% (#10 of 57) against 64.7% (#42 of 57) for GPT-5.4 Mini. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.
No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark at low effort, GPT-6 Sol leads with 73.6% against 15.8%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.
GPT-5.4 Mini is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0030 per sample against $0.0065. GPT-5.4 Mini is priced at $0.75 per 1M input tokens and $4.50 per 1M output; GPT-6 Sol is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.
GPT-5.4 Mini is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 5.3s per inference against 8.1s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.