Roboflow

GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6 Astra

Compare GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6 Astra side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Object Detection, Classification, Image Captioning, and OCR.

Compare GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6 Astra live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5.4 Mini
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-6 Astra
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6 Astra on Vision Evals

GPT-6 Astra scores higher on all five Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where GPT-6 Astra leads 82.1% to 15.8%.

Overall, GPT-5.4 Mini averages 53.2% (#51 of 63) against 83.4% (#2 of 63) for GPT-6 Astra.

GPT-5.4 Mini is both cheaper ($0.0034 vs $0.034 per sample) and faster (5.5s vs 9.9s per sample).

GPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6 Astra

GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6 Astra Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 20, 2026

PropertyGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6 Astra
OrganizationOpenAIOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Sep 2026
Context Window400K1.1M
ParametersUnknownUndisclosed
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.750$10.00
Output $/1M$4.50$50.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Promptable Concept SegmentationNot listedDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
53.2%
83.4%
Avg cost / sample$0.0034$0.034
Avg speed / sample5.51s9.94s
By task
Object Detection (low)
15.8%
±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 15.3 to 16.1
$0.0044
82.1%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.0 to 82.7
$0.050
Object Detection (high)
16.6%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 15.8 to 17.4
$0.030
83.6%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.8 to 84.5
$0.101
Counting (low)
58.6%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 56.8 to 60.8
$0.0019
80.2%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 81.1
$0.018
Counting (high)
64.9%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.5 to 67.6
$0.0073
81.1%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.7 to 82.4
$0.028
Identification (low)
83.3%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4
$0.0013
89.6%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6
$0.013
Identification (high)
82.3%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 84.4
$0.0055
92.7%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8
$0.014
OCR (low)
51.1%
$0.0035
77.8%
$0.034
by category
Single value
41.3%
Transcription
77.3%
Structured JSON
73.6%
Text localization
4.1%
Single value
60.9%
Transcription
95.9%
Structured JSON
91.8%
Text localization
75.5%
OCR (high)
55.8%
$0.027
77.6%
$0.084
by category
Single value
47.0%
Transcription
78.5%
Structured JSON
79.0%
Text localization
6.1%
Single value
59.6%
Transcription
97.5%
Structured JSON
91.7%
Text localization
76.8%
Reasoning (low)
57.0%
±3.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.3 to 60.9
$0.0022
87.2%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.1 to 88.1
$0.016
Reasoning (high)
64.0%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.9 to 65.6
$0.0096
91.2%
±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.7 to 91.4
$0.021

GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6 Astra: Overview

GPT-5.4 Mini

GPT-5.4 mini is a fast, cost-efficient model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, optimized for high-throughput workloads and subagent orchestration. It supports text and image inputs within a 400,000-token context window, making it ideal for processing extensive visual datasets and large codebases in a single request. Designed for low-latency production environments, the model integrates with key API features including function calling, web search, and tool-based computer use, allowing it to assist in automated workflows that require navigating digital interfaces.

Compared to the previous GPT-5 mini, this version runs more than twice as fast while approaching the performance levels of the flagship GPT-5.4 on reasoning and coding benchmarks. While the larger GPT-5.4 introduces native, state-of-the-art computer-use capabilities, GPT-5.4 mini provides a scalable alternative for interpreting screenshots and reasoning over dense UI layouts. For vision tasks on Playground, it excels at extracting structured information from visual documents and assisting in agentic tasks that involve real-time interpretation of software interfaces alongside text.

GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from OpenAI that accepts text and image input and produces text output. It is positioned as the company's flagship system for long-horizon end-to-end work spanning complex reasoning, software engineering, computer use, browsing, research and document creation. The model exposes a graduated reasoning effort control with low, medium, high, xhigh and max settings, and it accepts a change to that setting partway through a conversation rather than only at request time. It launches as a single tier with no smaller mini or nano variants, carries a context window of roughly 1.05 million tokens with a maximum output of 128,000 tokens, and reports a knowledge cutoff of April 30, 2026.

OpenAI reports evaluation results across agentic, scientific and security benchmarks, including 96.0% on GPQA Diamond, 64.6% on Terminal-Bench Science, 72.6% on OSWorld 2.0, and a perfect score on ExploitBench, along with near saturation on FrontierMath Tier 4 and ARC-AGI-3. The model supports computer use, structured outputs, streaming, programmatic tool calling, multi-agent orchestration, prompt caching and persisted reasoning, and it keeps earlier context windows searchable so it can recover requirements or tool outputs from previous turns. OpenAI describes Astra as the first of its models to cross the Critical cybersecurity capability threshold under its Preparedness Framework.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, GPT-6 Astra performed better. It scores higher on all five vision tasks and averages 83.4% (#2 of 63) against 53.2% (#51 of 63) for GPT-5.4 Mini. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark at low effort, GPT-6 Astra leads with 82.1% against 15.8%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

GPT-5.4 Mini is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0034 per sample against $0.034. GPT-5.4 Mini is priced at $0.75 per 1M input tokens and $4.50 per 1M output; GPT-6 Astra is priced at $10.00 per 1M input tokens and $50.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

GPT-5.4 Mini is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 5.5s per inference against 9.9s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for open prompts and object detection in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.