Roboflow

GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra

Compare GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, Object Detection, Open Prompt, and Segmentation.

Compare GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-6.1 Sol
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-6 Astra
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra on Vision Evals

GPT-6 Astra scores higher on 4 of the five Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Reasoning, where GPT-6 Astra leads 87.2% to 83.7%.

Overall, GPT-6.1 Sol averages 81.7% (#5 of 63) against 83.4% (#2 of 63) for GPT-6 Astra.

GPT-6.1 Sol is cheaper ($0.0068 vs $0.034 per sample), while GPT-6 Astra is faster (9.9s vs 12.8s per sample).

GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6 Astra

GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 16, 2026

PropertyGPT-6.1 SolGPT-6 Astra
OrganizationOpenAIOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateSep 2026Sep 2026
Context Window1.1M1.1M
ParametersundisclosedUndisclosed
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$10.00
Output $/1M$10.00$50.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Promptable Concept SegmentationDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
81.7%
83.4%
Avg cost / sample$0.0068$0.034
Avg speed / sample12.82s9.94s
By task
Object Detection (low)
80.8%
±0.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.7 to 80.9
$0.010
82.1%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.0 to 82.7
$0.050
Object Detection (high)
81.6%
±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.1 to 82.0
$0.022
83.6%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.8 to 84.5
$0.101
Counting (low)
78.8%
±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 82.4
$0.0037
80.2%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 81.1
$0.018
Counting (high)
80.2%
±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 77.0 to 83.8
$0.0057
81.1%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.7 to 82.4
$0.028
Identification (low)
89.6%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6
$0.0025
89.6%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6
$0.013
Identification (high)
88.5%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6
$0.0030
92.7%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8
$0.014
OCR (low)
75.8%
$0.0069
77.8%
$0.034
by category
Single value
58.3%
Transcription
95.7%
Structured JSON
89.5%
Text localization
74.4%
Single value
60.9%
Transcription
95.9%
Structured JSON
91.8%
Text localization
75.5%
OCR (high)
75.8%
$0.016
77.6%
$0.084
by category
Single value
56.5%
Transcription
96.0%
Structured JSON
90.4%
Text localization
76.7%
Single value
59.6%
Transcription
97.5%
Structured JSON
91.7%
Text localization
76.8%
Reasoning (low)
83.7%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.1 to 84.8
$0.0033
87.2%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.1 to 88.1
$0.016
Reasoning (high)
88.7%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.4 to 91.4
$0.0042
91.2%
±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.7 to 91.4
$0.021

GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra: Overview

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol is a reasoning model in OpenAI's GPT-6 series that accepts text and image input and returns text. It is an upgrade to GPT-6 Sol positioned to approach the intelligence of the larger GPT-6 Astra model on agentic coding, computer use, and professional knowledge work. The model exposes an adjustable reasoning effort control, ranging from low settings for simple turns to maximum settings for harder tasks, and can be driven with tool use enabled or disabled. It operates over a context window of roughly one million tokens and emits up to 128,000 output tokens in a single response, which supports long-running agent loops over large codebases and multi-document collections. Audio and video inputs are not supported.

On the visual side, the model is evaluated on GDP.pdf, a benchmark that asks professional questions about complex PDF documents containing tables, charts, diagrams, and fine-print details, and on OSWorld 2.0, which measures agents operating graphical computer applications. OpenAI reports that GPT-6.1 Sol performs on par with or better than GPT-6 Sol across its image input safety evaluations, and that the share of responses containing a factual error at low reasoning effort falls from 11.4 percent to 7.7 percent.

GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from OpenAI that accepts text and image input and produces text output. It is positioned as the company's flagship system for long-horizon end-to-end work spanning complex reasoning, software engineering, computer use, browsing, research and document creation. The model exposes a graduated reasoning effort control with low, medium, high, xhigh and max settings, and it accepts a change to that setting partway through a conversation rather than only at request time. It launches as a single tier with no smaller mini or nano variants, carries a context window of roughly 1.05 million tokens with a maximum output of 128,000 tokens, and reports a knowledge cutoff of April 30, 2026.

OpenAI reports evaluation results across agentic, scientific and security benchmarks, including 96.0% on GPQA Diamond, 64.6% on Terminal-Bench Science, 72.6% on OSWorld 2.0, and a perfect score on ExploitBench, along with near saturation on FrontierMath Tier 4 and ARC-AGI-3. The model supports computer use, structured outputs, streaming, programmatic tool calling, multi-agent orchestration, prompt caching and persisted reasoning, and it keeps earlier context windows searchable so it can recover requirements or tool outputs from previous turns. OpenAI describes Astra as the first of its models to cross the Critical cybersecurity capability threshold under its Preparedness Framework.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, GPT-6 Astra performed better. It scores higher on 4 of the five vision tasks and averages 83.4% (#2 of 63) against 81.7% (#5 of 63) for GPT-6.1 Sol. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals Reasoning benchmark at low effort, GPT-6 Astra leads with 87.2% against 83.7%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

GPT-6.1 Sol is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0068 per sample against $0.034. GPT-6.1 Sol is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output; GPT-6 Astra is priced at $10.00 per 1M input tokens and $50.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

GPT-6 Astra is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 9.9s per inference against 12.8s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.