GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-5.6 Sol
Compare GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-5.6 Sol side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Object Detection, Classification, Image Captioning, and OCR.
Compare GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-5.6 Sol live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-5.6 Sol on Vision Evals
GPT-5.6 Sol scores higher on 5 of the six Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Object Detection, where GPT-5.6 Sol leads 68.2% to 16.1%.
Overall, GPT-5.4 Mini averages 63.5% (#27 of 31) against 76.9% (#10 of 31) for GPT-5.6 Sol.
GPT-5.4 Mini is both cheaper ($0.0030 vs $0.0089 per sample) and faster (5.3s vs 11.7s per sample).
GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-5.6 Sol Comparison Table
Evals updated August 20, 2026Pricing updated August 24, 2026
| Property | GPT-5.4 Mini | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Mar 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Context Window | 400K | 1.5M |
| Parameters | ||
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.750 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $4.50 | $10.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 63.5% | 76.9% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0030 | $0.0089 |
| Avg speed / sample | 5.35s | 11.72s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | 16.1% $0.0044 | 68.2% $0.016 |
| Counting | 60.8% $0.0019 | 73.0% $0.0048 |
| Identification | 78.1% $0.0013 | 81.3% $0.0027 |
| OCR | 88.1% $0.0042 | 90.7% $0.011 |
| Data Extraction | 82.5% $0.0014 | 82.5% $0.0033 |
| Reasoning (low) | 55.6% $0.0023 | 65.6% $0.0042 |
| Reasoning (high) | 62.9% $0.0081 | 72.2% $0.0057 |
GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-5.6 Sol: Overview
GPT-5.4 mini is a fast, cost-efficient model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, optimized for high-throughput workloads and subagent orchestration. It supports text and image inputs within a 400,000-token context window, making it ideal for processing extensive visual datasets and large codebases in a single request. Designed for low-latency production environments, the model integrates with key API features including function calling, web search, and tool-based computer use, allowing it to assist in automated workflows that require navigating digital interfaces.
Compared to the previous GPT-5 mini, this version runs more than twice as fast while approaching the performance levels of the flagship GPT-5.4 on reasoning and coding benchmarks. While the larger GPT-5.4 introduces native, state-of-the-art computer-use capabilities, GPT-5.4 mini provides a scalable alternative for interpreting screenshots and reasoning over dense UI layouts. For vision tasks on Playground, it excels at extracting structured information from visual documents and assisting in agentic tasks that involve real-time interpretation of software interfaces alongside text.
GPT-5.6 Sol is the flagship model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes Terra (a balanced everyday-work tier) and Luna (a fast, cost-efficient tier). Sol is designed for demanding reasoning, long-horizon agentic workflows, software engineering, computer use, scientific research, and cybersecurity tasks. It introduces two new capability modes: a "max" reasoning effort setting that allocates additional compute time for difficult problems, and an "ultra" mode that coordinates multiple subagents in parallel to accelerate complex, multi-step work. The model supports native multimodal input, allowing it to process screenshots, diagrams, charts, documents, and photographs alongside text. A reported context window of approximately 1.5 million tokens enables processing of large codebases, lengthy research documents, and extended agentic sessions.
GPT-5.6 Sol was announced on June 26, 2026, initially in a limited preview for trusted partners, and reached general availability on July 9, 2026. On the Agents' Last Exam benchmark, which evaluates long-running professional workflows across 55 fields, Sol scores 53.6. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, which tests command-line agentic coding workflows, Sol Ultra achieves 91.9%. The model also demonstrates gains in life sciences evaluations, including long-horizon genomics and quantitative biology analyses. OpenAI paired the release with its most extensive safety evaluation to date, combining human red teaming with large-scale automated testing, and classified Sol as High capability in both cybersecurity and biological risk under its Preparedness Framework, though it does not cross the Critical threshold in either category.
Frequently Asked Questions
On Roboflow's Vision Evals, GPT-5.6 Sol performed better. It scores higher on 5 of the six vision tasks and averages 76.9% (#10 of 31) against 63.5% (#27 of 31) for GPT-5.4 Mini. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.
No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark, GPT-5.6 Sol leads with 68.2% against 16.1%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.
GPT-5.4 Mini is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0030 per sample against $0.0089. GPT-5.4 Mini is priced at $0.75 per 1M input tokens and $4.50 per 1M output; GPT-5.6 Sol is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.
GPT-5.4 Mini is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 5.3s per inference against 11.7s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for open prompts and object detection in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.