GLM-OCR vs Grok 4.5
Compare GLM-OCR and Grok 4.5 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR.
Compare GLM-OCR vs Grok 4.5 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
GLM-OCR vs Grok 4.5 Comparison Table
Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 15, 2026
| Property | GLM-OCR | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Z.ai | SpaceXAI |
| Category | open | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Mar 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Context Window | — | 500K |
| Parameters | 0.9B | |
| License | MIT | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | |
| Output $/1M | $6.00 | |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Document Question Answering | ||
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | |
| Captioning | Demo | |
| Classification | Demo | |
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Model Features | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | Not evaluated | 64.3% |
| Avg cost / sample | – | $0.0077 |
| Avg speed / sample | – | 14.33s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | – | 18.0% $0.0100 |
| Counting | – | 55.4% $0.0065 |
| Identification | – | 78.1% $0.0045 |
| OCR | – | 92.5% $0.0065 |
| Data Extraction | – | 83.5% $0.0044 |
| Reasoning (low) | – | 58.3% $0.0076 |
| Reasoning (high) | – | 59.6% $0.011 |
GLM-OCR vs Grok 4.5: Overview
GLM-OCR is a multimodal OCR model for complex document understanding, built on the GLM-V encoder-decoder architecture by Zhipu AI. The model combines a 0.4B-parameter CogViT visual encoder pre-trained on large-scale image-text data, a lightweight cross-modal connector with efficient token downsampling, and a 0.5B-parameter GLM language decoder, totaling 0.9B parameters. To address the inefficiency of standard autoregressive decoding in deterministic OCR tasks, GLM-OCR introduces a Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) mechanism that predicts multiple tokens per step, significantly improving decoding throughput while keeping memory overhead low through shared parameters. Training proceeds through four stages: visual encoder pretraining with MIM, CLIP, and distillation objectives; vision-language pretraining on document parsing, grounding, and VQA data; supervised fine-tuning on curated OCR datasets covering text, formula, table, and key information extraction; and full-task reinforcement learning to improve accuracy and structural consistency.
At the system level, GLM-OCR adopts a two-stage pipeline in which PP-DocLayout-V3 first performs layout analysis, followed by parallel region-level recognition. This design enables robust handling of diverse document layouts including tables, formulas, and multi-column text. The model supports document parsing and targeted recognition tasks, producing structured outputs in Markdown, JSON, and LaTeX formats across more than 100 languages. On the OmniDocBench V1.5 benchmark, GLM-OCR scores 94.62, and achieves 94.0 on OCRBench and 96.5 on UniMERNet for formula recognition.
Grok 4.5 is a proprietary reasoning model from SpaceXAI (xAI) that accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text, with a 500,000 token context window. xAI positions it as a model for coding, agentic software work, and knowledge tasks, and states it was trained in the company's Memphis data centers on datasets spanning science, engineering, and mathematics. Its reinforcement learning stage covers hundreds of thousands of multi step software engineering tasks scored by automated checks and model based grading, and training is reported to have run on tens of thousands of NVIDIA GB300 GPUs using an asynchronous scheme in which multi hour agentic rollouts continue while learning proceeds in parallel, targeting long horizon autonomous operation rather than single turn inference.
For vision, the model consumes JPEG and PNG images in any order relative to text prompts, covering visual question answering, description of chart and document imagery, and reading text rendered inside a scene. Reasoning effort is configurable, and the model supports function calling and structured outputs, so image inputs can be interleaved with tool calls inside agent loops. xAI has not published a technical report, architecture details, or parameter count, and reported mixture of experts sizing figures come from secondary coverage rather than official documentation.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLM-OCR has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals, so this comparison shows specs, licensing, and pricing rather than benchmark scores.
GLM-OCR is released under MIT, while Grok 4.5 uses Proprietary. Licensing often matters more than raw accuracy for commercial deployments, so check the terms against how you plan to ship.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.