Roboflow

Gemma 3 4B vs GLM-OCR

Compare Gemma 3 4B and GLM-OCR side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR.

Compare Gemma 3 4B vs GLM-OCR live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemma 3 4B
Run to compare this model.
Z.aiGLM-OCR
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs GLM-OCR: Overview

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma 3 4B, released on March 12, 2025, is the mid-sized member of Google DeepMind’s open-weight Gemma 3 family. With about 4 billion parameters, it is multimodal—supporting text and image inputs and generating text outputs. Like the larger Gemma 3 models, it features a 128,000-token input context window with an output capacity of ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to handle long documents and mixed text–image reasoning tasks.

The 4B variant is designed as a balance between efficiency and capability: it offers multilingual support across 140+ languages, strong summarization and reasoning performance, and compatibility with moderate hardware. Inference can run with ~6.4 GB VRAM in BF16, or significantly less in quantized 8-bit (~4.4 GB) or 4-bit (~3.4 GB) modes, making it accessible to developers outside large-scale infrastructure. While it lags behind the 12B and 27B versions on the most complex reasoning and multimodal benchmarks, its lower compute footprint makes it ideal for research, prototyping, and practical deployment where efficiency matters.

GLM-OCR

GLM-OCR is a multimodal OCR model for complex document understanding, built on the GLM-V encoder-decoder architecture by Zhipu AI. The model combines a 0.4B-parameter CogViT visual encoder pre-trained on large-scale image-text data, a lightweight cross-modal connector with efficient token downsampling, and a 0.5B-parameter GLM language decoder, totaling 0.9B parameters. To address the inefficiency of standard autoregressive decoding in deterministic OCR tasks, GLM-OCR introduces a Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) mechanism that predicts multiple tokens per step, significantly improving decoding throughput while keeping memory overhead low through shared parameters. Training proceeds through four stages: visual encoder pretraining with MIM, CLIP, and distillation objectives; vision-language pretraining on document parsing, grounding, and VQA data; supervised fine-tuning on curated OCR datasets covering text, formula, table, and key information extraction; and full-task reinforcement learning to improve accuracy and structural consistency.

At the system level, GLM-OCR adopts a two-stage pipeline in which PP-DocLayout-V3 first performs layout analysis, followed by parallel region-level recognition. This design enables robust handling of diverse document layouts including tables, formulas, and multi-column text. The model supports document parsing and targeted recognition tasks, producing structured outputs in Markdown, JSON, and LaTeX formats across more than 100 languages. On the OmniDocBench V1.5 benchmark, GLM-OCR scores 94.62, and achieves 94.0 on OCRBench and 96.5 on UniMERNet for formula recognition.

Gemma 3 4B vs GLM-OCR Comparison Table

PropertyGemma 3 4BGLM-OCR
OrganizationGoogleZ.ai
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2025Mar 2026
Context Window128K
Parameters4B0.9B
LicenseProprietaryMIT
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.050
Output $/1M$0.100
Vision Tasks
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
CaptioningDemo
Chart Question Answering
Document Question Answering
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
37.31%
Avg Response Time16.80s
Defect Detection
60%(9/15)
Document Understanding
55.6%(5/9)
Object Counting
0%(0/10)
Object Understanding
42.9%(6/14)
Spatial Understanding
26.3%(5/19)
OCR
Overall Score
64.19%
87.34%
Avg Response Time0.92s1.00s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens300
Median output tokens12
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark<$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
63.6%(63/99)
87.9%(87/99)
Handwritten Math
10%(1/10)
100%(10/10)
License Plate Recognition
86.7%(26/30)
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
73.3%(22/30)
90%(27/30)
VQA & Extraction
58.3%(35/60)
81.7%(49/60)