GLM 5V Turbo vs Grok 4.6
Compare GLM 5V Turbo and Grok 4.6 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.
Compare GLM 5V Turbo vs Grok 4.6 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
GLM 5V Turbo vs Grok 4.6 on Vision Evals
Grok 4.6 scores higher on 3 of the five Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Object Detection, where GLM 5V Turbo leads 56.5% to 23.8%.
Overall, GLM 5V Turbo averages 54.6% (#49 of 63) against 59.1% (#36 of 63) for Grok 4.6.
GLM 5V Turbo is both cheaper ($0.0037 vs $0.011 per sample) and faster (5.9s vs 19.3s per sample).
GLM 5V Turbo vs Grok 4.6 Comparison Table
Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 17, 2026
| Property | GLM 5V Turbo | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Z.ai | SpaceXAI |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Apr 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Context Window | 200K | 500K |
| Parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | commercial use per vendor terms | commercial use per vendor terms |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $1.20 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $4.00 | $6.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Image Tagging | Supported | Supported |
| Multi-Label Classification | Supported | Supported |
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | Supported | Supported |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | Supported | Supported |
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | Supported | Supported |
| Multimodal Vision | Supported | Supported |
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 54.6% | 59.1% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0037 | $0.011 |
| Avg speed / sample | 5.89s | 19.32s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 56.5% | 23.8% ±2.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 20.2 to 25.9 |
| Object Detection (high) | – | 24.0% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 23.1 to 25.1 |
| Counting (low) | 48.6% | 65.8% ±4.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.2 to 70.3 |
| Counting (high) | – | 56.8% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.4 to 58.1 |
| Identification (low) | 84.4% | 84.4% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 87.5 |
| Identification (high) | – | 85.4% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 87.5 |
| OCR (low) | 51.5% | 60.6% |
| by category |
|
|
| OCR (high) | 56.0% | 61.2% |
| by category |
|
|
| Reasoning (low) | 31.8% | 61.1% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.6 to 62.3 |
| Reasoning (high) | 49.7% | 63.8% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.3 to 66.2 |
GLM 5V Turbo vs Grok 4.6: Overview
GLM-5V-Turbo is a native multimodal model from Z.ai that extends the GLM family with joint image, video, and text input aimed at vision-centered coding and agent workflows. The model reads screenshots, design drafts, document layouts, and interface captures and generates runnable code from them, covering tasks such as turning a visual design into a working front end, diagnosing rendering and layout defects from screen captures, and operating graphical user interfaces during long-horizon agent runs. It accepts roughly 200,000 input tokens and can emit up to 131,072 output tokens in a single response, which supports sessions that hold specifications, source files, logs, and visual references at the same time.
Training includes a joint reinforcement learning stage spanning more than 30 tasks simultaneously, an approach Z.ai describes as a way to counter the trade-off in which improving visual recognition degrades programming ability and the reverse. Reported evaluations cover pure-text coding on the backend, frontend, and repository exploration tracks of CC-Bench-V2, together with agent execution suites such as PinchBench, ClawEval, and ZClawBench, indicating that text coding behavior is retained after visual input is added.
Grok 4.6 is a proprietary reasoning model from xAI aimed at long-running agentic workflows, coding, and knowledge work. It accepts text and image input and returns text, with a 500,000 token context window and a knowledge cutoff of February 1, 2026. The model exposes an adjustable reasoning budget with low, medium, high, and xhigh settings, where high is the default, and it supports function calling, structured outputs, web and X search, and code execution as documented tool behaviors. Its visual capability covers interpreting images supplied alongside text prompts, which places it in the visual question answering and document understanding family, and it can also return object detection boxes as text coordinates when prompted.
xAI characterizes Grok 4.6 as the result of an extended post-training run over the Grok 4.5 lineage rather than a new pretrained base. The described recipe combines curated model-generated reasoning and technical data, engineering data, a revised optimizer, regenerated supervised fine-tuning trajectories, and reinforcement learning across agent environments spanning knowledge work, coding, kernel optimization, web development, and computer-aided design. Parameter count and architecture specifics are not disclosed. Independent measurement from Artificial Analysis places the model at 61 on its Intelligence Index, five points above Grok 4.5.