GPT-6.1 Sol vs Grok 4.6
GPT-6.1 Sol and Grok 4.6 score 81.7% vs 59.1% averaged across five Vision Evals tasks (#9 and #42 of 69 models), so GPT-6.1 Sol leads overall.
- GPT-6.1 Sol wins all 5 tasks, with its widest lead on object detection (80.8% vs 23.8%).
- GPT-6.1 Sol is about half the cost: $0.0068 vs $0.011 overall average cost per sample.
- GPT-6.1 Sol is faster: 12.8s vs 19.3s per sample.
Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.
Compare GPT-6.1 Sol vs Grok 4.6 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Grok 4.6 on Vision Evals
Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Grok 4.6 Comparison Table
Evals updated November 12, 2026Pricing updated November 13, 2026
| Property | GPT-6.1 Sol | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | OpenAI | SpaceXAI |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Sep 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.1M | 500K |
| Parameters | undisclosed | Unknown |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | commercial use per vendor terms | commercial use per vendor terms |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $10.00 | $6.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Promptable Concept Segmentation | Demo | Not listed |
| Model Features | ||
Both support 3 more features | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 81.7% | 59.1% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0068 | $0.011 |
| Avg speed / sample | 12.82s | 19.32s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 80.8% ±0.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.7 to 80.9 | 23.8% ±2.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 20.2 to 25.9 |
| Object Detection (high) | 81.6% ±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.1 to 82.0 | 24.0% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 23.1 to 25.1 |
| Counting (low) | 78.8% ±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 82.4 | 65.8% ±4.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.2 to 70.3 |
| Counting (high) | 80.2% ±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 77.0 to 83.8 | 56.8% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.4 to 58.1 |
| Identification (low) | 89.6% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6 | 84.4% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 87.5 |
| Identification (high) | 88.5% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6 | 85.4% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 87.5 |
| OCR (low) | 75.8% | 60.6% |
| by category |
|
|
| OCR (high) | 75.8% | 61.2% |
| by category |
|
|
| Reasoning (low) | 83.7% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.1 to 84.8 | 61.1% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.6 to 62.3 |
| Reasoning (high) | 88.7% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.4 to 91.4 | 63.8% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.3 to 66.2 |
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Grok 4.6: Overview
GPT-6.1 Sol is a reasoning model in OpenAI's GPT-6 series that accepts text and image input and returns text. It is an upgrade to GPT-6 Sol positioned to approach the intelligence of the larger GPT-6 Astra model on agentic coding, computer use, and professional knowledge work. The model exposes an adjustable reasoning effort control, ranging from low settings for simple turns to maximum settings for harder tasks, and can be driven with tool use enabled or disabled. It operates over a context window of roughly one million tokens and emits up to 128,000 output tokens in a single response, which supports long-running agent loops over large codebases and multi-document collections. Audio and video inputs are not supported.
OpenAI reports that GPT-6.1 Sol performs on par with or better than GPT-6 Sol across its image input safety evaluations, and that the share of responses containing a factual error at low reasoning effort falls from 11.4 percent to 7.7 percent.
Grok 4.6 is a proprietary reasoning model from xAI aimed at long-running agentic workflows, coding, and knowledge work. It accepts text and image input and returns text, with a 500,000 token context window and a knowledge cutoff of February 1, 2026. The model exposes an adjustable reasoning budget with low, medium, high, and xhigh settings, where high is the default, and it supports function calling, structured outputs, web and X search, and code execution as documented tool behaviors. Its visual capability covers interpreting images supplied alongside text prompts, which places it in the visual question answering and document understanding family, and it can also return object detection boxes as text coordinates when prompted.
xAI characterizes Grok 4.6 as the result of an extended post-training run over the Grok 4.5 lineage rather than a new pretrained base. The described recipe combines curated model-generated reasoning and technical data, engineering data, a revised optimizer, regenerated supervised fine-tuning trajectories, and reinforcement learning across agent environments spanning knowledge work, coding, kernel optimization, web development, and computer-aided design. Parameter count and architecture specifics are not disclosed.