Gemma 4 12B vs Grok 4.7
Compare Gemma 4 12B and Grok 4.7 side-by-side.
Compare Gemma 4 12B vs Grok 4.7 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.
Models in this comparison
Gemma 4 12B vs Grok 4.7 Comparison Table
Evals updated September 22, 2026Pricing updated September 22, 2026
| Property | Gemma 4 12B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | SpaceXAI | |
| Category | open | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | — |
| Release Date | Jun 2026 | Sep 2026 |
| Context Window | — | 500K |
| Parameters | 12B | |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $1.60 | |
| Output $/1M | $4.80 | |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | ||
| OCR | ||
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | ||
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | ||
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | ||
| Model Features | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | Not evaluated | 71.9% |
| Avg cost / sample | – | $0.012 |
| Avg speed / sample | – | 23.55s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | – | 40.4% ±0.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 39.8 to 41.0 |
| Object Detection (high) | – | 41.2% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 39.6 to 42.8 |
| Counting (low) | – | 61.7% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.8 to 63.5 |
| Counting (high) | – | 60.8% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.5 to 62.2 |
| Identification (low) | – | 87.5% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 90.6 |
| Identification (high) | – | 80.2% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 81.3 |
| OCR (low) | – | 92.6% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 92.1 to 93.4 |
| OCR (high) | – | 93.5% ±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.1 to 93.8 |
| Data Extraction (low) | – | 84.9% ±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.5 to 87.6 |
| Data Extraction (high) | – | 87.6% ±1.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.6 to 89.7 |
| Reasoning (low) | – | 64.2% ±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.3 to 66.9 |
| Reasoning (high) | – | 66.9% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.6 to 68.2 |
Gemma 4 12B vs Grok 4.7: Overview
Gemma 4 12B is an open-weight multimodal model from Google in the Gemma 4 family. It is intended for text and image understanding tasks such as visual question answering, OCR, captioning, and document understanding, with a smaller parameter footprint than the larger Gemma 4 variants.
This entry is connected to Roboflow Playground vision evals for comparison. No runnable Playground workflow is configured yet, so the model page is used for discovery and benchmark context rather than direct hosted inference.
Grok 4.7 is a proprietary model from SpaceXAI, released on September 21, 2026. It accepts text and images as input and returns text. It extends Grok 4.6 and is listed at the same API price.
Its Vision Evals scores are on the leaderboard. Running it in the Playground is not available yet, because the inference workflow is not ready.
Frequently Asked Questions
Gemma 4 12B has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals, so this comparison shows specs, licensing, and pricing rather than benchmark scores.
Gemma 4 12B is released under Apache 2.0, while Grok 4.7 uses Proprietary. Licensing often matters more than raw accuracy for commercial deployments, so check the terms against how you plan to ship.