Gemma 4 12B vs Grok 4.6
Compare Gemma 4 12B and Grok 4.6 side-by-side.
Compare Gemma 4 12B vs Grok 4.6 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.
Models in this comparison
Gemma 4 12B vs Grok 4.6 Comparison Table
Evals updated October 8, 2026Pricing updated October 9, 2026
| Property | Gemma 4 12B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | SpaceXAI | |
| Category | open | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Jun 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Context Window | — | 500K |
| Parameters | 12B | Unknown |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | No published price | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | No published price | $6.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Supported | Demo |
| OCR | Supported | Demo |
| Vision Language | Supported | Supported |
| Visual Question Answering | Supported | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | Not listed | Supported |
| Classification | Not listed | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | Not listed | Supported |
| Image Tagging | Not listed | Supported |
| Multi-Label Classification | Not listed | Supported |
| Object Detection | Not listed | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Multimodal Vision | Supported | Supported |
| Foundation Vision | Not listed | Supported |
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | Not listed | Supported |
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | Not evaluated | 59.1% |
| Avg cost / sample | – | $0.011 |
| Avg speed / sample | – | 19.32s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | – | 23.8% ±2.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 20.2 to 25.9 |
| Object Detection (high) | – | 24.0% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 23.1 to 25.1 |
| Counting (low) | – | 65.8% ±4.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.2 to 70.3 |
| Counting (high) | – | 56.8% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.4 to 58.1 |
| Identification (low) | – | 84.4% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 87.5 |
| Identification (high) | – | 85.4% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 87.5 |
| OCR (low) | – | 60.6% |
| by category |
| |
| OCR (high) | – | 61.2% |
| by category |
| |
| Reasoning (low) | – | 61.1% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.6 to 62.3 |
| Reasoning (high) | – | 63.8% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.3 to 66.2 |
Gemma 4 12B vs Grok 4.6: Overview
Gemma 4 12B is an open-weight multimodal model from Google in the Gemma 4 family. It is intended for text and image understanding tasks such as visual question answering, OCR, captioning, and document understanding, with a smaller parameter footprint than the larger Gemma 4 variants.
This entry is connected to Roboflow Playground vision evals for comparison. No runnable Playground workflow is configured yet, so the model page is used for discovery and benchmark context rather than direct hosted inference.
Grok 4.6 is a proprietary reasoning model from xAI aimed at long-running agentic workflows, coding, and knowledge work. It accepts text and image input and returns text, with a 500,000 token context window and a knowledge cutoff of February 1, 2026. The model exposes an adjustable reasoning budget with low, medium, high, and xhigh settings, where high is the default, and it supports function calling, structured outputs, web and X search, and code execution as documented tool behaviors. Its visual capability covers interpreting images supplied alongside text prompts, which places it in the visual question answering and document understanding family, and it can also return object detection boxes as text coordinates when prompted.
xAI characterizes Grok 4.6 as the result of an extended post-training run over the Grok 4.5 lineage rather than a new pretrained base. The described recipe combines curated model-generated reasoning and technical data, engineering data, a revised optimizer, regenerated supervised fine-tuning trajectories, and reinforcement learning across agent environments spanning knowledge work, coding, kernel optimization, web development, and computer-aided design. Parameter count and architecture specifics are not disclosed. Independent measurement from Artificial Analysis places the model at 61 on its Intelligence Index, five points above Grok 4.5.
Frequently Asked Questions
Gemma 4 12B has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals, so this comparison shows specs, licensing, and pricing rather than benchmark scores.
Gemma 4 12B is released under Apache 2.0, while Grok 4.6 uses Proprietary. Licensing often matters more than raw accuracy for commercial deployments, so check the terms against how you plan to ship.