Gemma 3 12B vs Grok 4.5
Compare Gemma 3 12B and Grok 4.5 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.
Compare Gemma 3 12B vs Grok 4.5 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Gemma 3 12B vs Grok 4.5 Comparison Table
Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 16, 2026
| Property | Gemma 3 12B | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | SpaceXAI | |
| Category | open | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Mar 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Context Window | 128K | 500K |
| Parameters | 12B | Unknown |
| License | Custom | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | See license terms | commercial use per vendor terms |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.050 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $0.150 | $6.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Classification | Supported | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Image Tagging | Supported | Supported |
| Multi-Label Classification | Supported | Supported |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | Supported | Supported |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Object Detection | Not listed | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | Supported | Supported |
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | Supported | Supported |
| Multimodal Vision | Supported | Supported |
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | Not evaluated | 55.3% |
| Avg cost / sample | – | $0.0078 |
| Avg speed / sample | – | 16.41s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | – | 19.0% ±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 18.0 to 19.6 |
| Object Detection (high) | – | 17.8% ±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 17.5 to 18.0 |
| Counting (low) | – | 59.5% ±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.4 to 62.2 |
| Counting (high) | – | 57.7% ±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.0 to 60.8 |
| Identification (low) | – | 83.3% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4 |
| Identification (high) | – | 85.4% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 87.5 |
| OCR (low) | – | 57.1% |
| by category |
| |
| OCR (high) | – | 57.5% |
| by category |
| |
| Reasoning (low) | – | 57.6% ±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.6 to 58.9 |
| Reasoning (high) | – | 59.8% ±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 57.0 to 62.3 |
Gemma 3 12B vs Grok 4.5: Overview
Gemma 3 12B, announced by Google DeepMind on March 12, 2025, is part of the open-weight Gemma 3 family, designed to provide a balance between capability and accessibility. With around 12 billion parameters, it supports multimodal input (text + images) and outputs text, making it useful for reasoning, summarization, Q&A, and visual understanding tasks. The model supports an input context of 128,000 tokens and typically generates up to ~8,000 tokens in output.
The 12B variant is instruction-tuned (“Gemma-3-12B-IT”) and optimized for multilingual use across more than 140 languages. It can run on a single GPU or TPU, offering a lighter compute footprint than very large proprietary models, while still achieving strong performance in reasoning benchmarks. Quantized and lower-precision variants are available to improve efficiency. Limitations include smaller output lengths relative to input capacity, scaling hardware needs at larger sizes, and performance below massive proprietary models on the most complex multimodal or reasoning-heavy tasks.
Grok 4.5 is a proprietary reasoning model from SpaceXAI (xAI) that accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text, with a 500,000 token context window. xAI positions it as a model for coding, agentic software work, and knowledge tasks, and states it was trained in the company's Memphis data centers on datasets spanning science, engineering, and mathematics. Its reinforcement learning stage covers hundreds of thousands of multi step software engineering tasks scored by automated checks and model based grading, and training is reported to have run on tens of thousands of NVIDIA GB300 GPUs using an asynchronous scheme in which multi hour agentic rollouts continue while learning proceeds in parallel, targeting long horizon autonomous operation rather than single turn inference.
For vision, the model consumes JPEG and PNG images in any order relative to text prompts, covering visual question answering, description of chart and document imagery, and reading text rendered inside a scene. Reasoning effort is configurable, and the model supports function calling and structured outputs, so image inputs can be interleaved with tool calls inside agent loops. xAI has not published a technical report, architecture details, or parameter count, and reported mixture of experts sizing figures come from secondary coverage rather than official documentation.