Roboflow

Gemini 3 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Compare Gemini 3 Flash and Muse Glimmer 30B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Classification, Open Prompt, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Gemini 3 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3 Flash
Run to compare this model.
MetaMuse Glimmer 30B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B on Vision Evals

Gemini 3 Flash scores higher on 4 of the five Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Identification, where Gemini 3 Flash leads 93.8% to 81.3%.

Overall, Gemini 3 Flash averages 65.7% (#27 of 63) against 61.4% (#34 of 63) for Muse Glimmer 30B.

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper ($0.0013 vs $0.0024 per sample), while Gemini 3 Flash is faster (5.8s vs 10.6s per sample).

Gemini 3 FlashMuse Glimmer 30B

Gemini 3 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 17, 2026

PropertyGemini 3 FlashMuse Glimmer 30B
OrganizationGoogleMeta
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateDec 2025Aug 2026
Context Window1.0M131K
ParametersUnknown29.6B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsfree for commercial use
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.500$0.300
Output $/1M$3.00$1.20
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
65.7%
61.4%
Avg cost / sample$0.0024$0.0013
Avg speed / sample5.83s10.60s
By task
Object Detection
38.6%
$0.0031
41.0%
$0.0017
Counting
67.6%
$0.0012
66.2%
$0.0007
Identification
93.8%
$0.0009
81.3%
$0.0005
OCR (low)
63.9%
$0.0024
60.7%
$0.0013
by category
Single value
63.9%
Transcription
90.5%
Structured JSON
80.2%
Text localization
7.6%
Single value
54.4%
Transcription
82.9%
Structured JSON
80.2%
Text localization
14.8%
OCR (high)
73.1%
$0.013
60.1%
$0.0033
by category
Single value
69.1%
Transcription
90.0%
Structured JSON
87.5%
Text localization
36.9%
Single value
54.4%
Transcription
78.4%
Structured JSON
80.0%
Text localization
13.7%
Reasoning (low)
64.9%
$0.0020
57.6%
$0.0009
Reasoning (high)
74.2%
$0.0040
62.9%
$0.0026

Gemini 3 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B: Overview

Gemini 3 Flash

Gemini 3 Flash is a proprietary multimodal large language model developed by Google through Google DeepMind, designed to deliver fast, cost-efficient reasoning across real-time products and developer workflows. Released in December 2025, it is the Flash-tier variant of the Gemini 3 family, balancing low latency with reasoning quality approaching Pro models.

The model supports text, images, audio, and video, with an exceptionally large context window of roughly one million input tokens and outputs up to ~65k tokens. It emphasizes rapid responses for coding, summarization, analysis, and agentic tasks, and exposes configurable “thinking levels” via API to trade speed for deeper reasoning. Today, Gemini 3 Flash positions itself as a high-throughput, production-ready model, serving as the default in the Gemini app and Google Search’s AI Mode, optimized for scalable, interactive AI applications.

Muse Glimmer 30B

Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense vision language model from Meta built for long-horizon agentic work on local hardware. The architecture pairs a 52-layer causal text decoder with a roughly 1.8B parameter ViT-G/14 perception encoder for about 29.6 billion parameters in total, and it accepts interleaved text and image input so an agent can interpret screenshots, charts, and documents alongside conversation. The decoder uses grouped-query attention with 32 query heads and 2 key-value heads, a repeating pattern of three sliding-window local attention layers followed by one global layer, SwiGLU feed-forward blocks, and rotary position embeddings applied on the local layers, supporting a trained context of 131,072 tokens.

Meta describes the model as distilled from the larger Muse Spark and trained and evaluated around agentic behavior: end-to-end task completion, schema-accurate tool calling, multi-step reasoning across extended workflows, and recovery when a tool call returns an unexpected result. Reasoning effort is selectable across low, medium, high, and xhigh settings, and the model emits channel-scoped reasoning traces together with XML style tool calls rather than JSON, which requires parsers specific to this family. A companion block-diffusion drafter head predicts blocks of 16 tokens per forward pass for speculative decoding, with the main model verifying the proposals in parallel.