Roboflow

Gemini 3 Flash vs Grok 4

Compare Gemini 3 Flash and Grok 4 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Gemini 3 Flash vs Grok 4 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3 Flash
Run to compare this model.
GrokGrok 4
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Grok

Gemini 3 Flash vs Grok 4: Overview

Gemini 3 Flash

Gemini 3 Flash is a proprietary multimodal large language model developed by Google through Google DeepMind, designed to deliver fast, cost-efficient reasoning across real-time products and developer workflows. Released in December 2025, it is the Flash-tier variant of the Gemini 3 family, balancing low latency with reasoning quality approaching Pro models.

The model supports text, images, audio, and video, with an exceptionally large context window of roughly one million input tokens and outputs up to ~65k tokens. It emphasizes rapid responses for coding, summarization, analysis, and agentic tasks, and exposes configurable “thinking levels” via API to trade speed for deeper reasoning. Today, Gemini 3 Flash positions itself as a high-throughput, production-ready model, serving as the default in the Gemini app and Google Search’s AI Mode, optimized for scalable, interactive AI applications.

Grok 4

Grok 4, released by xAI on July 9, 2025, is the fourth-generation model in the Grok family and the most advanced to date. It is multimodal, supporting text, vision, tool use, and real-time web search, with a reported 256,000-token context window for long-form reasoning and document analysis. Its training data extends through November 2024, making it the most up-to-date Grok model at launch.

The lineup includes Grok 4 Generalist for broad tasks, Grok 4 Heavy for higher-capacity reasoning, and Grok 4 Code optimized for programming and debugging. A notable feature is its always-on “Think” mode, designed for deeper multi-step reasoning. While xAI has not disclosed parameter counts, Grok 4 is positioned to compete with frontier models like GPT-5 and Claude 4, balancing real-time knowledge via web integration with structured tool use. It is best suited for coding, complex reasoning, and multimodal AI assistants.

Gemini 3 Flash vs Grok 4 Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 3 FlashGrok 4
OrganizationGooglexAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateDec 2025Jul 2025
Context Window1.0M256K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.500
Output $/1M$3.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
74.63%
52.24%
Avg Response Time9.85s85.24s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens290
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0014
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
44.4%(4/9)
Object Counting
30%(3/10)
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
85.7%(12/14)
57.1%(8/14)
Spatial Understanding
84.2%(16/19)
52.6%(10/19)
OCR
Overall Score
93.01%
Avg Response Time12.40s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens160
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0010
Focused Scene OCR
94.9%(94/99)
Handwritten Math
100%(10/10)
License Plate Recognition
100%(30/30)
Text Recognition
86.7%(26/30)
VQA & Extraction
88.3%(53/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology