Roboflow

Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Compare Gemini 3 Flash and GLM 5.3 Flash side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Classification, Open Prompt, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3 Flash
Run to compare this model.
Z.aiGLM 5.3 Flash
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash on Vision Evals

Gemini 3 Flash scores higher on 5 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Reasoning, where Gemini 3 Flash leads 64.9% to 51.0%.

Overall, Gemini 3 Flash averages 75.5% (#11 of 33) against 66.3% (#22 of 33) for GLM 5.3 Flash.

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper ($0.0002 vs $0.0021 per sample), while Gemini 3 Flash is faster (4.1s vs 6.8s per sample).

Gemini 3 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash

Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash Comparison Table

Evals updated August 26, 2026Pricing updated August 26, 2026

PropertyGemini 3 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash
OrganizationGoogleZ.ai
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateDec 2025Aug 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters320B total, 18B active
LicenseProprietaryMIT
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.500
Output $/1M$3.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
75.5%
66.3%
Avg cost / sample$0.0021$0.0002
Avg speed / sample4.10s6.78s
By task
Object Detection
42.6%
$0.0031
33.1%
$0.0004
Counting
67.6%
$0.0012
55.4%
$0.0001
Identification
93.8%
$0.0009
84.4%
$0.0001
OCR
87.6%
$0.0024
90.6%
$0.0002
Data Extraction
96.9%
$0.0008
83.5%
$0.0001
Reasoning (low)
64.9%
$0.0020
51.0%
$0.0001
Reasoning (high)
74.2%
$0.0040
59.6%
$0.0001

Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash: Overview

Gemini 3 Flash

Gemini 3 Flash is a proprietary multimodal large language model developed by Google through Google DeepMind, designed to deliver fast, cost-efficient reasoning across real-time products and developer workflows. Released in December 2025, it is the Flash-tier variant of the Gemini 3 family, balancing low latency with reasoning quality approaching Pro models.

The model supports text, images, audio, and video, with an exceptionally large context window of roughly one million input tokens and outputs up to ~65k tokens. It emphasizes rapid responses for coding, summarization, analysis, and agentic tasks, and exposes configurable “thinking levels” via API to trade speed for deeper reasoning. Today, Gemini 3 Flash positions itself as a high-throughput, production-ready model, serving as the default in the Gemini app and Google Search’s AI Mode, optimized for scalable, interactive AI applications.

GLM 5.3 Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash is the first natively multimodal model in Z.ai's GLM-5 series, a mixture-of-experts transformer with roughly 320 billion total parameters and 18 billion activated per token. It routes each token through 8 of 288 experts across 45 language layers that interleave KDA linear attention with sparse multi-head latent attention, and pairs them with a 24-layer vision encoder that handles image and video input. The checkpoint declares a maximum context length of 1,048,576 tokens, ships in native FP8, and includes a multi-token prediction draft layer for speculative decoding. Z.ai reports that the hybrid attention design reduces attention computation by 3.01x and KV cache size by 4.44x relative to GLM-5.3.

The model starts from a newly trained base built on a 30 trillion token multimodal pre-training corpus and adopts Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections to improve scaling efficiency. Vision is integrated into the coding and agent loop, so the model can inspect interfaces, rendered output, and images while operating across code, browsers, and graphical user interfaces. Z.ai reports scores of 84.3 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, 63.4 on DeepSWE 1.1, 55.3 on Humanity's Last Exam with tools, and 48.8 on AutomationBench, and the model exposes low, high, and max thinking modes.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Gemini 3 Flash performed better. It scores higher on 5 of the six vision tasks and averages 75.5% (#11 of 33) against 66.3% (#22 of 33) for GLM 5.3 Flash. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

Yes. On the Vision Evals Reasoning benchmark at low effort, Gemini 3 Flash leads with 64.9% against 51.0%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0002 per sample against $0.0021. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Gemini 3 Flash is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 4.1s per inference against 6.8s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for object detection and image classification in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.