Roboflow

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini

Compare Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-5.4 Mini side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, Classification, and OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Compare image classification labels and confidence scores side-by-side.

Open Classification in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.7 Flash
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-5.4 Mini
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini on Vision Evals

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on 5 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 69.4% to 16.1%.

Overall, Gemini 3.7 Flash averages 84.6% (#2 of 30) against 63.5% (#27 of 30) for GPT-5.4 Mini.

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper ($0.0016 vs $0.0030 per sample), while GPT-5.4 Mini is faster (5.3s vs 10.0s per sample).

Gemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.4 Mini

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini Comparison Table

Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 15, 2026

PropertyGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.4 Mini
OrganizationGoogleOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateAug 2026Mar 2026
Context Window1.0M400K
ParametersUndisclosed
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.375$0.750
Output $/1M$1.88$4.50
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
84.6%
63.5%
Avg cost / sample$0.0016$0.0030
Avg speed / sample9.97s5.35s
By task
Object Detection
69.4%
$0.0024
16.1%
$0.0044
Counting
77.0%
$0.0013
60.8%
$0.0019
Identification
96.9%
$0.0007
78.1%
$0.0013
OCR
86.9%
$0.0014
88.1%
$0.0042
Data Extraction
94.8%
$0.0007
82.5%
$0.0014
Reasoning (low)
82.8%
$0.0011
55.6%
$0.0023
Reasoning (high)
82.1%
$0.0026
62.9%
$0.0081

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini: Overview

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash is a proprietary multimodal model from Google, positioned in the Flash branch of the Gemini 3 series that trades some of the capacity of the larger Pro models for lower latency and lower cost per token. It accepts interleaved text and image input alongside other modalities handled by the Gemini family and returns text, and it continues the series pattern of exposing a configurable thinking budget so that reasoning effort can be scaled up for harder problems or reduced for high throughput extraction, routing and classification work. The model is announced roughly three weeks after Gemini 3.6 Flash, part of an unusually fast iteration cadence within the Flash line.

Google reports gains concentrated in agentic coding and front end generation, citing a WebDev Arena Elo of 1588 for this release compared with 1538 for the preceding Flash model, and describes it as producing more functional layouts and more feature complete applications in fewer prompts. Weights are not published and the architecture, parameter count and training corpus are undisclosed, consistent with prior Gemini releases. Visual capability follows the Flash lineage, covering image and document understanding, chart and diagram interpretation, text recognition in images, and general visual question answering.

GPT-5.4 Mini

GPT-5.4 mini is a fast, cost-efficient model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, optimized for high-throughput workloads and subagent orchestration. It supports text and image inputs within a 400,000-token context window, making it ideal for processing extensive visual datasets and large codebases in a single request. Designed for low-latency production environments, the model integrates with key API features including function calling, web search, and tool-based computer use, allowing it to assist in automated workflows that require navigating digital interfaces.

Compared to the previous GPT-5 mini, this version runs more than twice as fast while approaching the performance levels of the flagship GPT-5.4 on reasoning and coding benchmarks. While the larger GPT-5.4 introduces native, state-of-the-art computer-use capabilities, GPT-5.4 mini provides a scalable alternative for interpreting screenshots and reasoning over dense UI layouts. For vision tasks on Playground, it excels at extracting structured information from visual documents and assisting in agentic tasks that involve real-time interpretation of software interfaces alongside text.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Gemini 3.7 Flash performed better. It scores higher on 5 of the six vision tasks and averages 84.6% (#2 of 30) against 63.5% (#27 of 30) for GPT-5.4 Mini. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

Yes. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads with 69.4% against 16.1%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0016 per sample against $0.0030. Gemini 3.7 Flash is priced at $0.38 per 1M input tokens and $1.88 per 1M output; GPT-5.4 Mini is priced at $0.75 per 1M input tokens and $4.50 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

GPT-5.4 Mini is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 5.3s per inference against 10.0s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.