Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4o mini
Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-4o mini side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Open Prompt, Classification, OCR, and Image Captioning.
Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4o mini live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
GPT-4o mini is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.
Models in this comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4o mini: Overview
Gemini 2.5 Pro, released on June 17, 2025, is Google DeepMind’s most capable model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for deep reasoning, coding, and complex multimodal tasks. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and PDFs as input and outputs text. The model supports 1 million input tokens with an output capacity of up to 65K tokens, enabling large-scale comprehension of datasets, codebases, and technical documents. Its training knowledge extends to January 2025.
Pro outperforms earlier Gemini 2.0 models across benchmarks, including agentic coding tasks where it achieved ~63.8% on SWE-Bench Verified. It supports structured outputs, function calling, code execution, search grounding, and URL context, making it well-suited for enterprise, STEM, and developer workflows. However, it does not currently support image or audio generation in its stable release, and its higher computational cost and latency make it less efficient than Flash or Flash-Lite. It is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, and Vertex AI.
GPT-4o mini, launched by OpenAI in July 2024, is a lightweight, cost-efficient variant of GPT-4o designed for developers who need strong multimodal reasoning at scale. It supports text and vision inputs (with audio/video support planned) and offers a 128,000-token input context window with outputs up to ~16,000 tokens. Like GPT-4o, it has a knowledge cutoff of October 2023 and integrates the same safety mitigations against misuse and prompt attacks.
GPT-4o mini is significantly cheaper than full GPT-4o while outperforming older models such as GPT-3.5 Turbo. It achieves around 82% on MMLU, reflecting solid reasoning, math, and coding capabilities despite its efficiency focus. The model replaced GPT-3.5 Turbo as the default in ChatGPT for many users, making it widely accessible for everyday conversational AI, educational tools, content generation, and scalable multimodal applications where affordability and speed are priorities.
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4o mini Comparison Table
| Property | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | OpenAI | |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Jun 2025 | Jul 2024 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 128K |
| Parameters | ||
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $1.25 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $10.00 | $0.600 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | |
| Classification | Demo | |
| Object Detection | Demo | |
| OCR | Demo | |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Visual Understanding | ||
| Overall Score | 70.15% | |
| Avg Response Time | 11.87s | |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 294 | |
| Median output tokens | 565 | |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0060 | |
| Defect Detection | 73.3%(11/15) | |
| Document Understanding | 88.9%(8/9) | |
| Object Counting | 20%(2/10) | |
| Object Understanding | 78.6%(11/14) | |
| Spatial Understanding | 78.9%(15/19) | |
| OCR | ||
| Overall Score | 78.6% | |
| Avg Response Time | 4.91s | |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 290 | |
| Median output tokens | 323 | |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0036 | |
| Focused Scene OCR | 78.8%(78/99) | |
| Handwritten Math | 80%(8/10) | |
| License Plate Recognition | 90%(27/30) | |
| Text Recognition | 73.3%(22/30) | |
| VQA & Extraction | 75%(45/60) | |
Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology