Roboflow

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4.1 mini

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-4.1 mini side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Open Prompt, Classification, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4.1 mini live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-4.1 mini

GPT-4.1 mini is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4.1 mini: Overview

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro, released on June 17, 2025, is Google DeepMind’s most capable model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for deep reasoning, coding, and complex multimodal tasks. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and PDFs as input and outputs text. The model supports 1 million input tokens with an output capacity of up to 65K tokens, enabling large-scale comprehension of datasets, codebases, and technical documents. Its training knowledge extends to January 2025.

Pro outperforms earlier Gemini 2.0 models across benchmarks, including agentic coding tasks where it achieved ~63.8% on SWE-Bench Verified. It supports structured outputs, function calling, code execution, search grounding, and URL context, making it well-suited for enterprise, STEM, and developer workflows. However, it does not currently support image or audio generation in its stable release, and its higher computational cost and latency make it less efficient than Flash or Flash-Lite. It is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, and Vertex AI.

GPT-4.1 mini

GPT-4.1 mini, released by OpenAI in April 2025, is a smaller, faster, and cheaper variant of GPT-4.1 designed for high-throughput and cost-sensitive applications. It is multimodal, handling both text and images, and inherits the full model’s strengths in coding, structured outputs, and long-context reasoning. With support for up to 1 million tokens, it enables reliable processing of extended documents, multi-file codebases, and lengthy conversations while keeping latency low.

GPT-4.1 mini offers an efficient alternative to GPT-4.1 and replaced GPT-4o mini as the default ChatGPT model in May 2025. Despite being smaller, it matches or outperforms GPT-4o on several benchmarks, particularly for instruction following and real-world coding tasks. Ideal use cases include large-scale conversational systems, affordable developer tools, document analysis, and interactive assistants where speed and cost are critical.

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4.1 mini Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 2.5 ProGPT-4.1 mini
OrganizationGoogleOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2025Apr 2025
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.25$0.400
Output $/1M$10.00$1.60
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemo
ClassificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
70.15%
Avg Response Time11.87s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens294
Median output tokens565
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0060
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
78.6%(11/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
OCR
Overall Score
78.6%
Avg Response Time4.91s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens290
Median output tokens323
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0036
Focused Scene OCR
78.8%(78/99)
Handwritten Math
80%(8/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
73.3%(22/30)
VQA & Extraction
75%(45/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology