Roboflow

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 4 Argon

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini 4 Argon side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Open Prompt, Classification, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 4 Argon live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 4 Argon
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 4 Argon on Vision Evals

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on 4 of the five Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 82.5% to 33.7%.

Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro averages 57.6% (#40 of 63) against 87.5% (#1 of 63) for Gemini 4 Argon.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is both cheaper ($0.0051 vs $0.0058 per sample) and faster (6.8s vs 13.4s per sample).

Gemini 2.5 ProGemini 4 Argon

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 4 Argon Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 13, 2026

PropertyGemini 2.5 ProGemini 4 Argon
OrganizationGoogleGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2025Oct 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
ParametersUnknownUndisclosed
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.25$2.00
Output $/1M$10.00$10.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
57.6%
87.5%
Avg cost / sample$0.0051$0.0058
Avg speed / sample6.83s13.40s
By task
Object Detection (low)
33.7%
$0.010
82.5%
±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.9 to 83.0
$0.011
Object Detection (high)–
85.1%
±0.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.3 to 85.5
$0.027
Counting (low)
52.7%
$0.0012
86.0%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 85.1 to 86.5
$0.0024
Counting (high)–
90.5%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 89.2 to 91.9
$0.010
Identification (low)
93.8%
$0.0012
93.8%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 93.8
$0.0024
Identification (high)–
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
$0.0057
OCR (low)
65.2%
$0.0046
85.7%
$0.0051
by category
Single value
60.9%
Transcription
86.8%
Structured JSON
76.3%
Text localization
35.9%
Single value
78.3%
Transcription
95.5%
Structured JSON
92.6%
Text localization
81.5%
OCR (high)
64.6%
$0.025
88.0%
$0.022
by category
Single value
63.0%
Transcription
87.3%
Structured JSON
78.3%
Text localization
20.6%
Single value
80.0%
Transcription
98.8%
Structured JSON
94.8%
Text localization
84.7%
Reasoning (low)
42.4%
$0.0013
89.4%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 88.1 to 90.7
$0.0024
Reasoning (high)
62.3%
$0.011
91.4%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.7 to 92.0
$0.013

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 4 Argon: Overview

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro, released on June 17, 2025, is Google DeepMind’s most capable model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for deep reasoning, coding, and complex multimodal tasks. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and PDFs as input and outputs text. The model supports 1 million input tokens with an output capacity of up to 65K tokens, enabling large-scale comprehension of datasets, codebases, and technical documents. Its training knowledge extends to January 2025.

Pro outperforms earlier Gemini 2.0 models across benchmarks, including agentic coding tasks where it achieved ~63.8% on SWE-Bench Verified. It supports structured outputs, function calling, code execution, search grounding, and URL context, making it well-suited for enterprise, STEM, and developer workflows. However, it does not currently support image or audio generation in its stable release, and its higher computational cost and latency make it less efficient than Flash or Flash-Lite. It is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, and Vertex AI.

Gemini 4 Argon

Gemini 4 Argon is Google DeepMind's frontier Gemini 4 model, built to sustain extended reasoning across long-horizon workflows in software engineering, enterprise knowledge work such as legal and finance, scientific analysis, and defensive cybersecurity. It accepts text, image, video, and document input and returns text, operating over a one million token context window. The model raises the maximum output length to one million tokens, compared with a 64K ceiling on earlier Gemini releases, so a single reasoning trajectory can run for hundreds of thousands of tokens before terminating.

On the visual side, Argon targets multimodal document comprehension, professional chart analysis, and retrieval of specific details from long recordings, reporting 91.7% on LVBench for long-video understanding and 71.6% on Chartography for chart reasoning. Google also reports 77.9% on DeepSWE v1.1, 51.3% on AutomationBench, 68% on CWE-bench v1, and first place on the Vals Index, which aggregates finance, coding, legal, and tax tasks. Following Gemini API conventions, it localizes objects by emitting bounding boxes as [ymin, xmin, ymax, xmax] integers normalized to a 0 to 1000 range, which supports prompt driven detection and grounding alongside captioning, document parsing, and visual question answering. Google describes adversarial training and automated red teaming for indirect prompt injection resistance, plus chain-of-thought and action monitors that halt execution when behavior drifts outside user intent.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Gemini 4 Argon performed better. It scores higher on 4 of the five vision tasks and averages 87.5% (#1 of 63) against 57.6% (#40 of 63) for Gemini 2.5 Pro. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark at low effort, Gemini 4 Argon leads with 82.5% against 33.7%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0051 per sample against $0.0058. Gemini 2.5 Pro is priced at $1.25 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output; Gemini 4 Argon is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 6.8s per inference against 13.4s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for object detection and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.