Roboflow

Claude Sonnet 5 vs SAM 3

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 and SAM 3 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection.

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 vs SAM 3 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5
Run to compare this model.
MetaSAM 3
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Meta

Claude Sonnet 5 vs SAM 3: Overview

Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is a mid-tier large language model from Anthropic, released on June 30, 2026, as the latest model in the Sonnet series and a direct successor to Claude Sonnet 4.6. It is a hybrid reasoning model designed primarily for agentic workflows, software coding, and professional tasks. The model features a 1 million token context window, a 128k maximum output token limit, and runs adaptive thinking by default, giving API users fine-grained control over reasoning effort across five levels (low, medium, high, max, and extra-high). It uses an updated tokenizer shared with Opus 4.7 and later models, which produces approximately 30% more tokens for equivalent text compared to earlier Claude models. On benchmarks, Sonnet 5 scores 63.2% on agentic coding and 81.2% on OSWorld, narrowing the gap with Opus 4.8 while remaining at Sonnet-tier pricing.

The model supports text and image input with text output, and accepts tools including browsers and terminals for autonomous multi-step task execution. Anthropic's safety evaluations report that Sonnet 5 shows a lower rate of undesirable behaviors than Sonnet 4.6 and is generally safer in agentic contexts, with improved resistance to prompt injection and reduced sycophancy. Cybersecurity safeguards equivalent to those on Opus 4.7 and 4.8 are active, though Anthropic notes the model was not deliberately trained on cybersecurity tasks. The model is proprietary and API-only, with no open weights.

SAM 3

Released on November 19th, 2025, Segment Anything 3 (SAM 3) is a zero-shot image segmentation model that “detects, segments, and tracks objects in images and videos based on concept prompts.” This model was developed by Meta as the third model in the Segment Anything series.

Unlike its previous SAM models (Segment Anything and Segment Anything 2), you can provide SAM 3 with the prompt “shipping container” and it will generate precise segmentation masks for all shipping containers in an image. SAM 3 generates segmentation masks that correspond to the location of the objects found with a text prompt.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs SAM 3 Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Sonnet 5SAM 3
OrganizationAnthropicMeta
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Nov 2025
Context Window1.0M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00
Output $/1M$10.00
Vision Tasks
Object DetectionDemoDemo
CaptioningDemo
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Instance Segmentation
Multi-Label Classification
OCRDemo
Promptable Concept SegmentationDemo
Video Object Tracking
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Zero Shot Segmentation
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Zero-shot Detection
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
70.15%
Avg Response Time3.90s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.1K
Median output tokens61
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0048
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
66.7%(6/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
OCR
Overall Score
83.84%
Avg Response Time2.77s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens642
Median output tokens64
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0019
Focused Scene OCR
88.9%(88/99)
Handwritten Math
50%(5/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
VQA & Extraction
80%(48/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology