Roboflow

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Open Prompt, OCR, Classification, and Image Captioning.

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro on Vision Evals

Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher on 5 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Identification, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 93.8% to 81.3%.

Overall, Claude Sonnet 5 averages 66.4% (#21 of 30) against 66.0% (#22 of 30) for Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper ($0.0050 vs $0.0064 per sample), while Claude Sonnet 5 is faster (4.8s vs 6.1s per sample).

Claude Sonnet 5Gemini 2.5 Pro

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Comparison Table

Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 19, 2026

PropertyClaude Sonnet 5Gemini 2.5 Pro
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Jun 2025
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$1.25
Output $/1M$10.00$10.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
66.4%
66.0%
Avg cost / sample$0.0064$0.0050
Avg speed / sample4.84s6.11s
By task
Object Detection
36.1%
$0.011
33.7%
$0.010
Counting
56.8%
$0.0030
52.7%
$0.0012
Identification
81.3%
$0.0027
93.8%
$0.0012
OCR
91.7%
$0.0078
88.8%
$0.0047
Data Extraction
89.7%
$0.0030
84.5%
$0.0013
Reasoning (low)
43.0%
$0.0032
42.4%
$0.0013
Reasoning (high)
43.0%
$0.0043
62.3%
$0.011

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: Overview

Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is a mid-tier large language model from Anthropic, released on June 30, 2026, as the latest model in the Sonnet series and a direct successor to Claude Sonnet 4.6. It is a hybrid reasoning model designed primarily for agentic workflows, software coding, and professional tasks. The model features a 1 million token context window, a 128k maximum output token limit, and runs adaptive thinking by default, giving API users fine-grained control over reasoning effort across five levels (low, medium, high, max, and extra-high). It uses an updated tokenizer shared with Opus 4.7 and later models, which produces approximately 30% more tokens for equivalent text compared to earlier Claude models. On benchmarks, Sonnet 5 scores 63.2% on agentic coding and 81.2% on OSWorld, narrowing the gap with Opus 4.8 while remaining at Sonnet-tier pricing.

The model supports text and image input with text output, and accepts tools including browsers and terminals for autonomous multi-step task execution. Anthropic's safety evaluations report that Sonnet 5 shows a lower rate of undesirable behaviors than Sonnet 4.6 and is generally safer in agentic contexts, with improved resistance to prompt injection and reduced sycophancy. Cybersecurity safeguards equivalent to those on Opus 4.7 and 4.8 are active, though Anthropic notes the model was not deliberately trained on cybersecurity tasks. The model is proprietary and API-only, with no open weights.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro, released on June 17, 2025, is Google DeepMind’s most capable model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for deep reasoning, coding, and complex multimodal tasks. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and PDFs as input and outputs text. The model supports 1 million input tokens with an output capacity of up to 65K tokens, enabling large-scale comprehension of datasets, codebases, and technical documents. Its training knowledge extends to January 2025.

Pro outperforms earlier Gemini 2.0 models across benchmarks, including agentic coding tasks where it achieved ~63.8% on SWE-Bench Verified. It supports structured outputs, function calling, code execution, search grounding, and URL context, making it well-suited for enterprise, STEM, and developer workflows. However, it does not currently support image or audio generation in its stable release, and its higher computational cost and latency make it less efficient than Flash or Flash-Lite. It is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, and Vertex AI.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Claude Sonnet 5 performed better. It scores higher on 5 of the six vision tasks and averages 66.4% (#21 of 30) against 66.0% (#22 of 30) for Gemini 2.5 Pro. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals Identification benchmark, Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 93.8% against 81.3%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0050 per sample against $0.0064. Claude Sonnet 5 is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output; Gemini 2.5 Pro is priced at $1.25 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Claude Sonnet 5 is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 4.8s per inference against 6.1s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for object detection and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.