Roboflow

Claude Fable 5.2 vs SAM 3

Claude Fable 5.2: 86.5% average across five Vision Evals tasks (#2 of 67 models). We have not run SAM 3 through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score.

Meta

Compare Claude Fable 5.2 vs SAM 3 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs SAM 3 Comparison Table

Evals updated November 10, 2026Pricing updated November 10, 2026

PropertyClaude Fable 5.2SAM 3
OrganizationAnthropicMeta
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateNov 2026Nov 2025
Context Window1.0M—
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseProprietaryCustom
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsSee license terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$8.00No published price
Output $/1M$40.00No published price
Vision Tasks
Object DetectionSupportedDemo
CaptioningSupportedNot listed
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedNot listed
ClassificationSupportedNot listed
Document Question AnsweringSupportedNot listed
Image TaggingSupportedNot listed
Instance SegmentationNot listedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedNot listed
OCRSupportedNot listed
Open Vocabulary Object DetectionNot listedSupported
Promptable Concept SegmentationNot listedDemo
Video Object TrackingNot listedSupported
Vision LanguageSupportedNot listed
Visual Question AnsweringSupportedNot listed
Zero Shot SegmentationNot listedSupported
Model Features
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedNot listed
Zero-shot DetectionNot listedSupported
Both support 2 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
86.5%
Not evaluated
Avg cost / sample$0.031–
Avg speed / sample9.33s–
By task
Object Detection (low)
81.6%
±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.2 to 81.9
$0.048
–
Object Detection (high)
83.3%
±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.8 to 83.7
$0.055
–
Counting (low)
86.5%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.5 to 86.5
$0.015
–
Counting (high)
92.8%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 91.9 to 94.6
$0.021
–
Identification (low)
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
$0.011
–
Identification (high)
94.8%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 96.9
$0.012
–
OCR (low)
79.5%
$0.030
–
by category
Single value
64.8%
Transcription
94.7%
Structured JSON
92.8%
Text localization
74.5%
OCR (high)
84.8%
$0.043
–
by category
Single value
77.4%
Transcription
97.9%
Structured JSON
94.1%
Text localization
72.9%
Reasoning (low)
88.1%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.8 to 89.4
$0.016
–
Reasoning (high)
92.0%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 91.4 to 93.4
$0.024
–

Claude Fable 5.2 vs SAM 3: Overview

Claude Fable 5.2

Claude Fable 5.2 is a proprietary multimodal model from Anthropic, released on November 9, 2026. It accepts text and images and produces text, with a one million token context window and up to 128,000 output tokens. Adaptive thinking is always enabled, with an effort setting that controls reasoning. Anthropic positions Fable for demanding reasoning and long-running technical work, including coding and analysis of visual inputs.

Fable 5.2 succeeds Fable 5.1. Anthropic reports improvements in coding, reasoning, and vision, with output generation up to 30% faster than its predecessor. Fable and Mythos 5.2 share an underlying model, with additional cybersecurity and biology safeguards applied to Fable. Model weights are not publicly released.

SAM 3

Released on November 19th, 2025, Segment Anything 3 (SAM 3) is a zero-shot image segmentation model that “detects, segments, and tracks objects in images and videos based on concept prompts.” This model was developed by Meta as the third model in the Segment Anything series.

Unlike its previous SAM models (Segment Anything and Segment Anything 2), you can provide SAM 3 with the prompt “shipping container” and it will generate precise segmentation masks for all shipping containers in an image. SAM 3 generates segmentation masks that correspond to the location of the objects found with a text prompt.