Roboflow

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Terra side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Classification, Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.5
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra Comparison Table

Evals updated October 8, 2026Pricing updated October 8, 2026

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-5.6 Terra
OrganizationAnthropicOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateSep 2025Jul 2026
Context Window200K1.1M
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$3.00$2.00
Output $/1M$15.00$12.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
OverallNot evaluated
66.0%
Avg cost / sample–$0.010
Avg speed / sample–9.52s
By task
Object Detection (low)–
60.6%
±0.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.3 to 60.7
$0.014
Object Detection (high)–
61.3%
±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.8 to 61.6
$0.026
Counting (low)–
65.8%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.5 to 67.6
$0.0056
Counting (high)–
62.6%
±2.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.5 to 64.9
$0.0076
Identification (low)–
86.5%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 87.5
$0.0034
Identification (high)–
86.5%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 90.6
$0.0038
OCR (low)–
56.3%
$0.011
by category
Single value
36.1%
Transcription
79.9%
Structured JSON
76.8%
Text localization
42.3%
OCR (high)–
56.9%
$0.021
by category
Single value
37.4%
Transcription
80.2%
Structured JSON
77.3%
Text localization
41.9%
Reasoning (low)–
60.9%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.6 to 63.6
$0.0051
Reasoning (high)–
65.3%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.2 to 66.2
$0.0067

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra: Overview

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5, released by Anthropic in September 2025, is the company’s most advanced Sonnet-series model, built for high-performance reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic workflows. It is a multimodal system that accepts both text and images, with a 200,000-token context window designed for handling large documents and extended interactions. Anthropic highlights its improvements in reliability, reduced sycophancy, and alignment, making it suitable for sustained enterprise use.

The model delivers strong results in coding and autonomous workflows, achieving 61.4% on the OSWorld benchmark and leading performance on SWE-bench Verified. It introduces infrastructure features such as a memory tool (beta), checkpointing for Claude Code, parallel tool use, and tighter integration with VS Code. Compared to Opus, which targets broader reasoning, Sonnet 4.5 is optimized for structured, long-duration tasks. Positioned against leading offerings from OpenAI and Google, it is aimed at enterprise automation, software engineering, and research-intensive applications.

GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra is the mid-tier reasoning model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes the flagship Sol and the lightweight Luna. Introduced in a limited preview on June 26, 2026, and made broadly available on July 9, 2026, Terra accepts text and image input and produces text output, supporting vision, function calling, tool use, and agentic workflows. It is designed as a balanced option for everyday professional and production workloads — including coding assistance, document analysis, customer support, and multi-step agent tasks — where both output quality and cost efficiency matter. OpenAI positions Terra as delivering performance competitive with GPT-5.5 at approximately half the price, with a context window of around 1,050,000 tokens. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Terra scores 84.3%, matching Claude Fable 5 on that benchmark. Under OpenAI's Preparedness Framework, Terra is rated High for cybersecurity and biological capabilities, meaning it demonstrates meaningful capability in those domains without reaching the Critical threshold.

GPT-5.6 introduces a new naming convention in which the generation number (5.6) is paired with a durable capability tier name (Sol, Terra, or Luna), allowing each tier to advance on its own schedule. Terra carries the API identifier gpt-5.6-terra and supports the same reasoning effort controls available across the family, including adjustable reasoning depth. The model includes prompt caching with explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life, with cache writes billed at 1.25x the uncached input rate and cache reads receiving a 90% discount. GPT-5.6 Terra is a proprietary, closed-weights model served through the OpenAI API, Codex, and ChatGPT.

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Sonnet 4.5 has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals, so this comparison shows specs, licensing, and pricing rather than benchmark scores.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for object detection and image classification in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.