Roboflow

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5: 82.0% average across five Vision Evals tasks (#4 of 65 models). We have not run Claude Sonnet 4.5 through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score. Run both on your own image below.

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.5
Run to compare this model.
AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5
Run to compare this model.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5 Comparison Table

Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 6, 2026

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.5Claude Opus 5.5
OrganizationAnthropicAnthropic
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateSep 2025Sep 2026
Context Window200K1.0M
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$3.00$4.00
Output $/1M$15.00$20.00
Vision Tasks
Both support 10 more tasks
Model Features
Both support 3 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
OverallNot evaluated
82.0%
Avg cost / sample–$0.015
Avg speed / sample–7.63s
By task
Object Detection (low)–
74.5%
±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.0 to 75.0
$0.021
Object Detection (high)–
76.0%
±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.7 to 77.0
$0.030
Counting (low)–
80.6%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 82.4
$0.0081
Counting (high)–
82.0%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.7 to 83.8
$0.0098
Identification (low)–
93.8%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 93.8
$0.0058
Identification (high)–
95.8%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 96.9
$0.0067
OCR (low)–
78.3%
$0.016
by category
Single value
67.8%
Transcription
96.7%
Structured JSON
91.5%
Text localization
61.0%
OCR (high)–
79.9%
$0.023
by category
Single value
69.6%
Transcription
96.1%
Structured JSON
94.1%
Text localization
61.1%
Reasoning (low)–
83.0%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.1 to 84.1
$0.0090
Reasoning (high)–
85.9%
±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.8 to 88.1
$0.011

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5: Overview

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5, released by Anthropic in September 2025, is the company’s most advanced Sonnet-series model, built for high-performance reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic workflows. It is a multimodal system that accepts both text and images, with a 200,000-token context window designed for handling large documents and extended interactions. Anthropic highlights its improvements in reliability, reduced sycophancy, and alignment, making it suitable for sustained enterprise use.

It introduces infrastructure features such as a memory tool (beta), checkpointing for Claude Code, parallel tool use, and tighter integration with VS Code. Compared to Opus, which targets broader reasoning, Sonnet 4.5 is optimized for structured, long-duration tasks. Positioned against leading offerings from OpenAI and Google, it is aimed at enterprise automation, software engineering, and research-intensive applications.

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5 is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from Anthropic and the first entry in the Claude 5.5 family. It accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text, with a one million token context window and up to 128,000 output tokens per response. Adaptive thinking is always enabled on this model and cannot be disabled; thinking depth is instead governed by an effort parameter with five levels, where medium is the default, a change from the high default used by Claude Opus 5 and earlier Opus models. Anthropic reports a knowledge cutoff of June 2026.

On the visual side, Anthropic characterizes Opus 5.5 as its strongest Opus release for vision and computer use, describing improved reading of dense documents, charts, screenshots, and diagrams for document extraction and visual analysis tasks. The accompanying system card states that Opus 5.5 scored higher than Opus 5 on every evaluation in its capability summary, with the largest gains concentrated in agentic coding, visual reasoning, computer use, and long-horizon knowledge work. The model ships with safety classifiers covering biology and cybersecurity that can route blocked requests to earlier Claude models.