Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5: 82.0% average across five Vision Evals tasks (#4 of 65 models). We have not run Claude Haiku 4.5 through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score. Run both on your own image below.
Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5 Comparison Table
Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 7, 2026
| Property | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Oct 2025 | Sep 2026 |
| Context Window | 200K | 1.0M |
| Parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | commercial use per vendor terms | commercial use per vendor terms |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $1.00 | $4.00 |
| Output $/1M | $5.00 | $20.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Model Features | ||
Both support 3 more features | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | Not evaluated | 82.0% |
| Avg cost / sample | – | $0.015 |
| Avg speed / sample | – | 7.63s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | – | 74.5% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.0 to 75.0 |
| Object Detection (high) | – | 76.0% ±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.7 to 77.0 |
| Counting (low) | – | 80.6% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 82.4 |
| Counting (high) | – | 82.0% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.7 to 83.8 |
| Identification (low) | – | 93.8% ±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 93.8 |
| Identification (high) | – | 95.8% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 96.9 |
| OCR (low) | – | 78.3% |
| by category |
| |
| OCR (high) | – | 79.9% |
| by category |
| |
| Reasoning (low) | – | 83.0% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.1 to 84.1 |
| Reasoning (high) | – | 85.9% ±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.8 to 88.1 |
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5: Overview
Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s lightweight model in the Claude 4.5 series, released in October 2025 under a proprietary license. Designed for speed and cost efficiency, it delivers near-frontier performance while maintaining Anthropic’s AI Safety Level 2 standard. Haiku 4.5 supports both text and multimodal (text and image) inputs, integrates tool use and extended reasoning, and features a 200,000 token context window, making it adept at handling long or complex workflows. Haiku 4.5 is ideal for developers and researchers seeking rapid, cost-effective model calls for analysis, coding, or multimodal understanding.
Claude Opus 5.5 is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from Anthropic and the first entry in the Claude 5.5 family. It accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text, with a one million token context window and up to 128,000 output tokens per response. Adaptive thinking is always enabled on this model and cannot be disabled; thinking depth is instead governed by an effort parameter with five levels, where medium is the default, a change from the high default used by Claude Opus 5 and earlier Opus models. Anthropic reports a knowledge cutoff of June 2026.
On the visual side, Anthropic characterizes Opus 5.5 as its strongest Opus release for vision and computer use, describing improved reading of dense documents, charts, screenshots, and diagrams for document extraction and visual analysis tasks. The accompanying system card states that Opus 5.5 scored higher than Opus 5 on every evaluation in its capability summary, with the largest gains concentrated in agentic coding, visual reasoning, computer use, and long-horizon knowledge work. The model ships with safety classifiers covering biology and cybersecurity that can route blocked requests to earlier Claude models.