Roboflow

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, OCR, Classification, and Object Detection.

Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5
Run to compare this model.
AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5 Comparison Table

Evals updated October 8, 2026Pricing updated October 10, 2026

PropertyClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 5.5
OrganizationAnthropicAnthropic
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateOct 2025Sep 2026
Context Window200K1.0M
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.00$4.00
Output $/1M$5.00$20.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
OverallNot evaluated
82.0%
Avg cost / sample–$0.015
Avg speed / sample–7.63s
By task
Object Detection (low)–
74.5%
±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.0 to 75.0
$0.021
Object Detection (high)–
76.0%
±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.7 to 77.0
$0.030
Counting (low)–
80.6%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 82.4
$0.0081
Counting (high)–
82.0%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.7 to 83.8
$0.0098
Identification (low)–
93.8%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 93.8
$0.0058
Identification (high)–
95.8%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 96.9
$0.0067
OCR (low)–
78.3%
$0.016
by category
Single value
67.8%
Transcription
96.7%
Structured JSON
91.5%
Text localization
61.0%
OCR (high)–
79.9%
$0.023
by category
Single value
69.6%
Transcription
96.1%
Structured JSON
94.1%
Text localization
61.1%
Reasoning (low)–
83.0%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.1 to 84.1
$0.0090
Reasoning (high)–
85.9%
±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.8 to 88.1
$0.011

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5: Overview

Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s lightweight model in the Claude 4.5 series, released in October 2025 under a proprietary license. Designed for speed and cost efficiency, it delivers near-frontier performance while maintaining Anthropic’s AI Safety Level 2 standard. Haiku 4.5 supports both text and multimodal (text and image) inputs, integrates tool use and extended reasoning, and features a 200,000 token context window, making it adept at handling long or complex workflows. Though the parameter count remains undisclosed, it achieves about 73.3% on SWE-bench Verified, reflecting strong coding and reasoning ability. Haiku 4.5 is ideal for developers and researchers seeking rapid, cost-effective model calls for analysis, coding, or multimodal understanding.

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5 is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from Anthropic and the first entry in the Claude 5.5 family. It accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text, with a one million token context window and up to 128,000 output tokens per response. Adaptive thinking is always enabled on this model and cannot be disabled; thinking depth is instead governed by an effort parameter with five levels, where medium is the default, a change from the high default used by Claude Opus 5 and earlier Opus models. Anthropic reports a knowledge cutoff of June 2026.

On the visual side, Anthropic characterizes Opus 5.5 as its strongest Opus release for vision and computer use, describing improved reading of dense documents, charts, screenshots, and diagrams for document extraction and visual analysis tasks. Published results include 89.0% on Chartography with tools and 81.8% on OSWorld 2.0 under partial credit scoring, alongside 48.7% under strict scoring reported in the system card. The accompanying system card states that Opus 5.5 scored higher than Opus 5 on every evaluation in its capability summary, with the largest gains concentrated in agentic coding, visual reasoning, computer use, and long-horizon knowledge work. The model ships with safety classifiers covering biology and cybersecurity that can route blocked requests to earlier Claude models.

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals, so this comparison shows specs, licensing, and pricing rather than benchmark scores.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.