Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1
Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Fable 5.1 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, OCR, Classification, and Object Detection.
Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1 Comparison Table
Evals updated September 2, 2026Pricing updated September 2, 2026
| Property | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Oct 2025 | Sep 2026 |
| Context Window | 200K | 1.0M |
| Parameters | ||
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $1.00 | $10.00 |
| Output $/1M | $5.00 | $50.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | Not evaluated | 81.3% |
| Avg cost / sample | – | $0.035 |
| Avg speed / sample | – | 8.28s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | – | 61.4% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 61.0 to 62.0 |
| Object Detection (high) | – | 65.0% ±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.6 to 65.3 |
| Counting (low) | – | 69.4% ±2.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 71.6 |
| Counting (high) | – | 73.0% ±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.6 to 77.0 |
| Identification (low) | – | 97.9% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 100.0 |
| Identification (high) | – | 96.9% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 100.0 |
| OCR (low) | – | 94.0% ±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.6 to 94.4 |
| OCR (high) | – | 93.6% ±0.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.5 to 93.9 |
| Data Extraction (low) | – | 93.1% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 92.8 to 93.8 |
| Data Extraction (high) | – | 93.5% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 92.8 to 93.8 |
| Reasoning (low) | – | 72.0% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 70.9 to 73.5 |
| Reasoning (high) | – | 73.1% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.5 to 75.5 |
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1: Overview
Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s lightweight model in the Claude 4.5 series, released in October 2025 under a proprietary license. Designed for speed and cost efficiency, it delivers near-frontier performance while maintaining Anthropic’s AI Safety Level 2 standard. Haiku 4.5 supports both text and multimodal (text and image) inputs, integrates tool use and extended reasoning, and features a 200,000 token context window, making it adept at handling long or complex workflows. Though the parameter count remains undisclosed, it achieves about 73.3% on SWE-bench Verified, reflecting strong coding and reasoning ability. Haiku 4.5 is ideal for developers and researchers seeking rapid, cost-effective model calls for analysis, coding, or multimodal understanding.
Claude Fable 5.1 is a proprietary multimodal model from Anthropic in the Mythos-class tier of the Claude 5 family, positioned above Claude Opus for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work. It accepts text and images as input and returns text, with a one million token context window and a maximum output of 128 thousand tokens. Adaptive thinking is always on, and an effort parameter controls how much reasoning the model applies to a given request. Anthropic reports a reliable knowledge and training data cutoff of June 2026. Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 share the same underlying model; the difference between them is the set of safety classifiers applied to dual-use cybersecurity and biology requests.
On the vision side, Anthropic documents improvements in reading dense charts, financial filings, and tables nested inside PDF documents, which extends the model toward document understanding, chart question answering, and spreadsheet and slide work. Reported evaluations cover agentic scientific research on Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, agentic coding on Terminal-Bench 4.0, computer use on OSWorld 2.0, and multidisciplinary reasoning on Humanity's Last Exam. Model weights are not published.
Frequently Asked Questions
Claude Haiku 4.5 has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals, so this comparison shows specs, licensing, and pricing rather than benchmark scores.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.