Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Compare Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
QwenQwen3.5 397B A17B
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.6 35B A3B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B: Overview

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is a 397B-parameter (17B active) open-weight multimodal model developed by Alibaba’s Qwen team, released on 2026-02-16 under Apache-2.0. It supports text and image inputs with text outputs, combining a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with Gated Delta Networks for efficient scaling. The model provides native vision-language reasoning and a large ~262K token context window, extendable to ~1M tokens.

As the first open-weight release in the Qwen3.5 family, it positions itself as a high-capacity, long-context alternative in the large vision-language space, balancing scale and efficiency via sparse activation. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding, agent workflows, and multimodal understanding tasks.

Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) multimodal language model developed by the Qwen team at Alibaba Group. It carries 35 billion total parameters but activates only approximately 3 billion per forward pass via a learned routing mechanism, giving it the representational capacity of a large dense model at a fraction of the inference compute. The model is natively multimodal, processing images, documents, and video alongside text as a core architectural capability rather than an add-on. It supports a native context window of 262,144 tokens, extensible up to 1,010,000 tokens via YaRN. A key design feature is the unified thinking/non-thinking mode framework: users can switch between deliberate chain-of-thought reasoning and fast direct responses within a single model, and a "thinking preservation" option retains reasoning context across multi-turn agentic workflows to reduce redundant computation.

The model is specifically optimized for agentic coding tasks, including repository-level reasoning, frontend workflow generation, multi-step tool use, and MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration. On SWE-bench Verified it scores 73.4%, on Terminal-Bench 2.0 it scores 51.5%, and on MCPMark it scores 37.0%. For vision-language tasks it achieves 92.0 on RefCOCO, 89.9 on OmniDocBench 1.5, and 83.7 on VideoMMMU. The model also supports Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) for speculative decoding. All Qwen3.6 open-weight models are released under the Apache 2.0 license.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B Comparison Table

PropertyQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.6 35B A3B
OrganizationQwenQwen
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Apr 2026
Context Window262K262K
Parameters397B35B total, 3B active
LicenseApache 2.0Apache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.385$0.140
Output $/1M$2.45$1.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
classificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Phrase Grounding
Video Classification
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
58.21%
Avg Response Time56.61s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens54
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0006
Defect Detection
66.7%(10/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
64.3%(9/14)
Spatial Understanding
57.9%(11/19)
OCR
Overall Score
68.56%
Avg Response Time7.45s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens122
Median output tokens20
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
57.6%(57/99)
Handwritten Math
80%(8/10)
License Plate Recognition
100%(30/30)
Text Recognition
70%(21/30)
VQA & Extraction
68.3%(41/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology