Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 9b

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3.5 9b side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Image Captioning, and OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 9b live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 9b
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 9b: Overview

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google DeepMind and released at Google I/O 2026. It is built on the Gemini 3 Flash reasoning foundation and introduces configurable thinking levels (minimal, low, medium, and high) that allow developers to tune the depth of internal reasoning before a response is generated. The model accepts text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs and produces text output, with a 1 million token context window and up to 65,000 output tokens per request. It is natively multimodal, processing visual inputs alongside text to support tasks such as image captioning, classification, optical character recognition, object detection, and visual grounding, where the model references specific regions within an image or video frame.

Its vision capabilities extend to interpreting UI screenshots, diagrams, charts, and real-world scenes, as well as understanding video and live frame sequences for activity and scene recognition. The model supports combined tool use, including Google Search, URL context, code execution, and custom functions, within a single request, and it uses reasoning context from previous turns when thought signatures are present in the conversation history, enabling persistent multi-turn reasoning chains. Gemini 3.5 Flash carries a knowledge cutoff of January 2026 and is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, Google Antigravity, and the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform.

Qwen3.5 9b

Qwen3.5-9B is a 9-billion-parameter multimodal foundation model developed by Alibaba Cloud's Qwen team, released on March 2, 2026 as part of the Qwen3.5 model family. Designed for efficient multimodal reasoning and long-context language tasks, it notably outperforms the older Qwen3-30B, a model more than three times its size, on key benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, IFEval, and LongBench.

The model supports vision-language inputs through an early-fusion multimodal architecture built on a dense hybrid foundation of Gated Delta Networks and Gated Attention. It can also operate in a text-only mode by skipping the vision encoder during inference. It provides a 262,144-token context window (extensible to ~1M tokens via YaRN) and is released under the Apache License 2.0. Within the current AI landscape, Qwen3.5-9B offers a strong balance of capability and efficiency, making it well-suited for multimodal assistants, document analysis, long-context reasoning, and developer-deployed agentic systems.

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 9b Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.5 9b
OrganizationGoogleQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMay 2026Mar 2026
Context Window1.0M262K
Parameters9B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.50$0.100
Output $/1M$9.00$0.150
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Multi-Label Classification
Vision Language
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
79.1%
71.64%
Avg Response Time6.71s8.99s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens294
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0043
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
86.7%(13/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
66.7%(6/9)
Object Counting
60%(6/10)
30%(3/10)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
71.4%(10/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
84.2%(16/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology