Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 and Mistral Small 3.1 24B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6
Run to compare this model.
MistralMistral Small 3.1 24B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B: Overview

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is the flagship large language model from Anthropic, released on 2026-02-05 for advanced reasoning, complex coding, and enterprise agent workflows. It supports text and image inputs via API, offers a 200K-token standard context window with a 1M-token beta option, and enables outputs up to 128K tokens, with adaptive reasoning and context compaction for sustained tasks.

As of 2026-02-17, Anthropic also released Claude Sonnet 4.6, extending the 1M-token context window to a broader tier. Opus remains positioned for maximum depth and benchmark performance, while Sonnet 4.6 brings long-context capability to more cost- and latency-sensitive production use cases.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Mistral Small 3.1 24B, released on March 17, 2025, is an open-weight multimodal model from Mistral AI, distributed under the Apache-2.0 license. With around 24B parameters and a 128K token context window, it is available in both base and instruction-tuned (“Instruct”) variants. The model introduces vision support alongside text, enabling tasks like multimodal reasoning, captioning, and image-based Q&A.

It is multilingual, supporting many languages, and is optimized for fast responses, function calling, structured dialogue, and long-context reasoning. Despite its size, the model can be run locally in quantized formats, fitting on machines with ~32GB RAM, making it accessible to developers outside large cloud setups. However, the output length is smaller than the 128K input window, meaning long generations may require chaining. In addition, using full vision features or the maximum context window significantly increases compute costs, and performance on highly complex reasoning or enterprise-scale tasks still trails larger proprietary frontier models.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6 Mistral Small 3.1 24B
OrganizationAnthropicMistral
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Mar 2025
Context Window1.0M128K
Parameters24B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$5.00$0.351
Output $/1M$25.00$0.555
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
64.18%
Avg Response Time23.35s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.2K
Median output tokens130
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.014
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
71.4%(10/14)
Spatial Understanding
68.4%(13/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology