Florence-2 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Compare Florence-2 and Gemma 4 26B A4B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Object Detection.

Compare Florence-2 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AzureFlorence-2
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Florence-2 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B: Overview

Florence-2

Florence-2, introduced by Microsoft Research at CVPR 2024, is an open-source vision-language foundation model designed to unify diverse computer vision tasks within a single sequence-to-sequence framework. Unlike traditional models that specialize in specific tasks, Florence-2 accepts both images and text prompts and outputs text for tasks such as captioning, object detection, segmentation, OCR, and region-based grounding. It comes in two sizes—Florence-2-base (~230M parameters) and Florence-2-large (~770M parameters)—and is trained on FLD-5B, a large dataset of ~126M images with ~5.4B annotations.

The model demonstrates strong zero-shot and fine-tuned performance, often rivaling larger vision-language systems while remaining lightweight and efficient. Released under the MIT license, all weights are publicly available, making it accessible for fine-tuning and deployment in applications like VQA, content tagging, accessibility, and research. Florence-2’s compact design, versatility, and openness position it as a practical alternative to larger proprietary multimodal models.

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B is the Mixture-of-Experts variant in Google's Gemma 4 family, with 25.2B total parameters but only 3.8B active per token. Built from the same Gemini 3 research as the 31B dense sibling and released as open weights under the Apache 2.0 license, it supports a 256K token context window with text and image input and configurable thinking mode. The "A4B" in the name refers to its approximately 4B active parameters. The MoE design makes it significantly faster at inference than the dense 31B, running nearly as fast as a 4B-parameter model while delivering roughly 97% of the dense model's quality.

For vision tasks, the 26B A4B shares the same multimodal capabilities as the 31B image understanding with variable aspect ratios and resolutions, and structured bounding box output for UI element detection. The tradeoff versus the 31B dense model is a small quality reduction in exchange for much faster inference and lower hardware requirements, fitting in 18GB of VRAM at 4-bit quantization. It ranked #6 among open models on the Arena AI text leaderboard at launch.

Florence-2 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B Comparison Table

PropertyFlorence-2Gemma 4 26B A4B
OrganizationMicrosoftGoogle
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2025Apr 2026
Context Window256K
Parameters230M25.2B
LicenseMITApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.060
Output $/1M$0.330
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
classificationDemo
Instance Segmentation
Open Vocabulary Object Detection
Phrase Grounding
Region Proposal
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
Multimodal Vision
Zero-shot Detection
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
68.66%
Avg Response Time30.23s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens294
Median output tokens214
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
85.7%(12/14)
Spatial Understanding
68.4%(13/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology