Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Compare Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.
Compare Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct: Overview
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is a 397B-parameter (17B active) open-weight multimodal model developed by Alibaba’s Qwen team, released on 2026-02-16 under Apache-2.0. It supports text and image inputs with text outputs, combining a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with Gated Delta Networks for efficient scaling. The model provides native vision-language reasoning and a large ~262K token context window, extendable to ~1M tokens.
As the first open-weight release in the Qwen3.5 family, it positions itself as a high-capacity, long-context alternative in the large vision-language space, balancing scale and efficiency via sparse activation. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding, agent workflows, and multimodal understanding tasks.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is an open-weight multimodal large language model developed by Alibaba as part of the Qwen family, built for instruction-following tasks that unify text generation with visual and video understanding. Released around October 2025 under the Apache-2.0 license, it targets efficient, high-fidelity vision-language reasoning across very long contexts.
The model accepts text and image inputs and produces text outputs, with strong performance in OCR, spatial reasoning, long-video understanding, and agentic or GUI-centric visual tasks. It uses a Mixture-of-Experts (A3B) design with ~31.1B total parameters and ~3B active per token, paired with Qwen3-VL’s unified multimodal stack (including Interleaved-MRoPE and DeepStack fusion) to process text, images, and video in a single architecture. OCR support expands to 32 languages, enhancing document workflows. With a native ~262K token context window (extendable further), it stands out today for its balance of scale, efficiency, long-context support, and open accessibility in multimodal systems.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct Comparison Table
| Property | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Qwen | Qwen |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Feb 2026 | Oct 2025 |
| Context Window | 262K | 262K |
| Parameters | 397B | 31B |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.385 | $0.130 |
| Output $/1M | $2.45 | $0.520 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Object Detection | ||
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Visual Understanding | ||
| Overall Score | 58.21% | |
| Avg Response Time | 56.61s | |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 1.1K | |
| Median output tokens | 54 | |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0006 | |
| Defect Detection | 66.7%(10/15) | |
| Document Understanding | 77.8%(7/9) | |
| Object Counting | 20%(2/10) | |
| Object Understanding | 64.3%(9/14) | |
| Spatial Understanding | 57.9%(11/19) | |
| OCR | ||
| Overall Score | 68.56% | |
| Avg Response Time | 7.45s | |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 122 | |
| Median output tokens | 20 | |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0001 | |
| Focused Scene OCR | 57.6%(57/99) | |
| Handwritten Math | 80%(8/10) | |
| License Plate Recognition | 100%(30/30) | |
| Text Recognition | 70%(21/30) | |
| VQA & Extraction | 68.3%(41/60) | |
Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology