Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder and Muse Spark 1.1 score 78.8% vs 74.4% averaged across five Vision Evals tasks (#10 and #16 of 65 models), so Muse Wonder leads overall.
- Muse Wonder wins 4 of the 5 tasks, with its widest lead on reasoning (85.2% vs 74.2%).
- Muse Spark 1.1 is about a quarter of the cost: $0.0075 vs $0.034 overall average cost per sample.
- Muse Spark 1.1 is faster: 7.2s vs 11.7s per sample.
Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.
Compare Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Wonder live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Wonder on Vision Evals
Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Wonder Comparison Table
Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 5, 2026
| Property | Muse Spark 1.1 | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Meta | Meta |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Parameters | Unknown | undisclosed |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | commercial use per vendor terms | commercial use per vendor terms |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $1.25 | $4.00 |
| Output $/1M | $4.25 | $20.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Model Features | ||
Both support 3 more features | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 74.4% | 78.8% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0075 | $0.034 |
| Avg speed / sample | 7.15s | 11.68s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 60.6% ±1.9, Mean of 3 runs, range 58.4 to 62.1 | 65.1% ±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.5 to 66.0 |
| Object Detection (high) | 60.0% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.6 to 60.7 | 66.0% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.2 to 66.5 |
| Counting (low) | 76.6% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 78.4 | 76.6% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 78.4 |
| Counting (high) | 76.1% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 77.0 | 79.7% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 81.1 |
| Identification (low) | 91.7% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8 | 92.7% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8 |
| Identification (high) | 89.6% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6 | 90.6% ±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 90.6 |
| OCR (low) | 68.8% | 74.3% |
| by category |
|
|
| OCR (high) | 67.5% | 76.0% |
| by category |
|
|
| Reasoning (low) | 74.2% ±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 72.2 to 75.5 | 85.2% ±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.8 to 85.4 |
| Reasoning (high) | 76.6% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.5 to 78.2 | 83.4% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.8 to 84.1 |
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Wonder: Overview
Muse Spark 1.1 is a natively multimodal reasoning model from Meta Superintelligence Labs, released on July 9, 2026, as a significant upgrade to the original Muse Spark. The model accepts text, image, video, PDF, and audio as input and produces text output. It operates with a 1-million-token context window (1,048,576 tokens per the Meta Model API documentation) and is designed specifically for agentic tasks that require planning, tool use, computer use, and multi-agent orchestration. The model runs in a "Thinking" mode, where adjustable reasoning effort is applied before generating a response. It can function both as a main agent gathering context, forming plans, and delegating to parallel subagents and as a subagent that adheres to assigned tasks and escalates when needed. It is trained to decide autonomously when to write automation scripts versus interact directly with a user interface.
Muse Spark 1.1 supports a range of multimodal capabilities including visual perception, image and video captioning, visual-to-code generation, and document analysis. The model was evaluated under Meta's Advanced AI Scaling Framework across frontier risk categories including chemical and biological threats, cybersecurity, and loss-of-control scenarios. Parameter count, architecture details, and training data composition are not publicly disclosed. The model is proprietary and closed-weight, accessible to consumers through the Meta AI app and to developers via the Meta Model API, which launched in public preview alongside this release.
Muse Wonder is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from Meta, released on October 12, 2026 as the first step past the Muse Spark line on Meta's scaling ladder. It launched together with Muse Wonder Full, a larger configuration that is available only through Muse Code subscription plans, while Muse Wonder itself is served through the Meta Model API under the identifier muse-wonder-1.0. The model accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents as input and returns text, with a context window of 1,048,576 tokens and graded reasoning effort settings. Meta trained both models at its Prometheus data center on larger base models than Muse Spark 1.3, and attributes their gains on unfamiliar tasks to post-training that transfers more effectively from a stronger base.
Meta positions Muse Wonder for long-running personal and professional agents: it plans multi-step work, delegates to sub-agents, calls tools in parallel, recovers from errors, and operates browsers and desktop or mobile applications. Two training objectives shape this behaviour. Active Memory carries goals, constraints, and earlier decisions across conversations and retrieves the details relevant to the current step, and Active Focus keeps the model trying alternative approaches when a task gets difficult while asking for clarification before important actions. Visual inputs such as screenshots, charts, and video feed the same reasoning loop, and the model emits bounding box coordinates for grounding queries. Meta's model card lists visual and spatial reasoning, especially 3D tasks, as a known limitation and recommends validating performance for applications that depend on precise spatial understanding.