Roboflow

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Compare Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.3 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR, Classification, Image Captioning, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.

Compare Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
MetaMuse Spark 1.1
Run to compare this model.
MetaMuse Spark 1.3
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3 on Vision Evals

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on 3 of the five Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Counting, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 76.6% to 74.3%.

Overall, Muse Spark 1.1 averages 74.4% (#15 of 63) against 73.9% (#16 of 63) for Muse Spark 1.3.

Muse Spark 1.1 is both cheaper ($0.0075 vs $0.0084 per sample) and faster (7.2s vs 25.5s per sample).

Muse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 18, 2026

PropertyMuse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.3
OrganizationMetaMeta
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJul 2026Sep 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.25$1.25
Output $/1M$4.25$4.25
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
74.4%
73.9%
Avg cost / sample$0.0075$0.0084
Avg speed / sample7.15s25.50s
By task
Object Detection (low)
60.6%
±1.9, Mean of 3 runs, range 58.4 to 62.1
$0.0097
58.6%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 58.0 to 59.4
$0.011
Object Detection (high)
60.0%
±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.6 to 60.7
$0.015
56.6%
±2.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.5 to 59.3
$0.017
Counting (low)
76.6%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 78.4
$0.0042
74.3%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 73.0 to 77.0
$0.0049
Counting (high)
76.1%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 77.0
$0.0079
75.7%
±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 73.0 to 79.7
$0.0094
Identification (low)
91.7%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8
$0.0033
92.7%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8
$0.0036
Identification (high)
89.6%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6
$0.0065
86.5%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 87.5
$0.0063
OCR (low)
68.8%
$0.0076
70.4%
$0.0086
by category
Single value
60.4%
Transcription
90.1%
Structured JSON
86.1%
Text localization
33.9%
Single value
62.6%
Transcription
91.8%
Structured JSON
88.0%
Text localization
33.3%
OCR (high)
67.5%
$0.015
69.8%
$0.015
by category
Single value
60.4%
Transcription
81.6%
Structured JSON
85.7%
Text localization
31.4%
Single value
62.2%
Transcription
86.8%
Structured JSON
87.2%
Text localization
35.2%
Reasoning (low)
74.2%
±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 72.2 to 75.5
$0.0061
73.3%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 72.2 to 74.2
$0.0064
Reasoning (high)
76.6%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.5 to 78.2
$0.013
73.1%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 72.2 to 74.2
$0.012

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3: Overview

Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is a natively multimodal reasoning model from Meta Superintelligence Labs, released on July 9, 2026, as a significant upgrade to the original Muse Spark. The model accepts text, image, video, PDF, and audio as input and produces text output. It operates with a 1-million-token context window (1,048,576 tokens per the Meta Model API documentation) and is designed specifically for agentic tasks that require planning, tool use, computer use, and multi-agent orchestration. The model runs in a "Thinking" mode, where adjustable reasoning effort is applied before generating a response. It can function both as a main agent gathering context, forming plans, and delegating to parallel subagents and as a subagent that adheres to assigned tasks and escalates when needed. It is trained to decide autonomously when to write automation scripts versus interact directly with a user interface.

Muse Spark 1.1 supports a range of multimodal capabilities including visual perception, image and video captioning, visual-to-code generation, and document analysis. The model was evaluated under Meta's Advanced AI Scaling Framework across frontier risk categories including chemical and biological threats, cybersecurity, and loss-of-control scenarios. Parameter count, architecture details, and training data composition are not publicly disclosed. The model is proprietary and closed-weight, accessible to consumers through the Meta AI app and to developers via the Meta Model API, which launched in public preview alongside this release.

Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from Meta Superintelligence Labs and the fourth Muse Spark release in five months, arriving on September 2, 2026. It takes text, images, video, and document files as input and returns text, and it operates over a context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Meta trains the model for long-horizon agentic work, so it carries accumulated context and prior tool results forward across many turns, reconciles messy or conflicting inputs, and asks for clarification when a task is underspecified. Visual inputs such as screenshots and video clips feed a reasoning loop that runs against a real execution environment rather than a scripted sequence of steps.

The model exposes graded reasoning effort settings. An xhigh configuration is generally available at launch, while a max reasoning configuration aimed at harder reasoning and agentic problems arrives after further safety testing. Artificial Analysis measures Muse Spark 1.3 (max) at 62 on its Intelligence Index and the xhigh configuration at 61, with agentic tool-use evaluations driving most of the gain over Muse Spark 1.2; max reaches 52% on Tau3-Bench Banking by spending more turns and reasoning tokens than xhigh. Prior Muse Spark versions emit bounding box coordinates, transcriptions, and structured field extractions from images on Roboflow Vision Evals.