Roboflow

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B

Compare Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3.5 35B A3B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
MetaLlama 4 Scout
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 35B A3B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Overview

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout, released on April 5, 2025, is one of Meta AI’s first Llama 4 multimodal models, alongside Maverick. It accepts text + image inputs and produces text outputs, with a knowledge cutoff of August 2024. Scout is notable for its extremely large context window of 10 million tokens, making it well-suited for analyzing very long documents, extended conversations, or large codebases.

Architecturally, Scout uses a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) system with 16 experts, activating ~17B parameters per inference from a pool of ~109B total parameters, balancing capacity with efficiency. It officially supports 12 languages (including English, Arabic, French, Hindi, and Spanish), while offering multimodal reasoning for images (captioning, Q&A, recognition). Meta highlights that Scout can run on a single Nvidia H100 GPU, making it more accessible than larger-scale Llama 4 models. However, its output token limit is far smaller than its 10M input window, image input support is still constrained, and license restrictions apply for large-scale commercial deployments.

Qwen3.5 35B A3B

The Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is a native vision-language model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team, released on February 24, 2026, as a high-efficiency entry in the Qwen 3.5 family. It utilizes a sophisticated hybrid architecture that integrates Gated Delta Networks with a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) system. While the model houses 35 billion total parameters, its routing mechanism activates only 8 routed experts and 1 shared expert per token, totaling approximately 3 billion active parameters. This design achieves cross-generational parity with the previous flagship Qwen3-235B dense model, delivering comparable reasoning and multimodal intelligence with significantly reduced inference latency and compute requirements. Available under the Apache 2.0 license, it is released in both base and instruction-tuned variants for seamless integration with open-source stacks like vLLM and Hugging Face Transformers.

Designed for the emerging era of agentic AI, the model utilizes a unified multimodal foundation built through early-fusion training. This approach allows it to outperform the prior Qwen3-VL series in spatial grounding, document analysis, and UI/GUI interaction. It features a native context window of 262,144 tokens, which is extensible up to 1,010,000 tokensvia RoPE scaling, and provides global support for 201 languages and dialects. This combination of a compact active parameter count and frontier-level visual comprehension makes it a versatile tool for developers requiring a balance of high-throughput speed and sophisticated visual reasoning for long-context workflows.

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B Comparison Table

PropertyLlama 4 ScoutQwen3.5 35B A3B
OrganizationMetaQwen
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateApr 2025Feb 2026
Context Window10.0M262K
Parameters109B35B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.100$0.140
Output $/1M$0.300$1.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object Detection
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
67.16%
79.1%
Avg Response Time43.93s20.94s
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
93.3%(14/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
40%(4/10)
Object Understanding
71.4%(10/14)
85.7%(12/14)
Spatial Understanding
73.7%(14/19)
84.2%(16/19)
OCR
Overall Score
70.74%
Avg Response Time0.74s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens472
Median output tokens12
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
56.6%(56/99)
Handwritten Math
70%(7/10)
License Plate Recognition
93.3%(28/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
VQA & Extraction
78.3%(47/60)