Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-27B
Compare Grok 4.5 and Qwen3.5-27B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, Classification, OCR, and Object Detection.
Compare Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-27B live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-27B on Vision Evals
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on 3 of the 4 Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Object Detection, where Qwen3.5-27B leads 50.5% to 19.0%.
Overall, Grok 4.5 averages 55.3% (#46 of 63) against 64.1% (#30 of 63) for Qwen3.5-27B.
Qwen3.5-27B is cheaper ($0.0043 vs $0.0078 per sample), while Grok 4.5 is faster (16.4s vs 80.4s per sample).
Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-27B Comparison Table
Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 17, 2026
| Property | Grok 4.5 | Qwen3.5-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | SpaceXAI | Qwen |
| Category | closed | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Jul 2026 | Feb 2026 |
| Context Window | 500K | 262K |
| Parameters | Unknown | 27B |
| License | Proprietary | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial use | commercial use per vendor terms | free for commercial use |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | $0.260 |
| Output $/1M | $6.00 | $2.60 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Image Tagging | Supported | Supported |
| Multi-Label Classification | Supported | Supported |
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | Supported | Supported |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | Supported | Supported |
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | Supported | Supported |
| Multimodal Vision | Supported | Supported |
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 55.3% | 64.1% 4/5 tasks |
| Quantizationsself-hosted | ||
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0078 | $0.0043 |
| Avg speed / sample | 16.41s | 80.37s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 19.0% ±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 18.0 to 19.6 | 50.5% ±3.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 46.1 to 53.0 |
| Object Detection (high) | 17.8% ±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 17.5 to 18.0 | – |
| Counting (low) | 59.5% ±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.4 to 62.2 | 67.6% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 68.9 |
| Counting (high) | 57.7% ±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.0 to 60.8 | – |
| Identification (low) | 83.3% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4 | 80.2% ±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.0 to 84.4 |
| Identification (high) | 85.4% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 87.5 | – |
| OCR (low) | 57.1% | – |
| by category |
| |
| OCR (high) | 57.5% | – |
| by category |
| |
| Reasoning (low) | 57.6% ±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.6 to 58.9 | 58.1% ±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.6 to 60.3 |
| Reasoning (high) | 59.8% ±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 57.0 to 62.3 | – |
Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-27B: Overview
Grok 4.5 is a proprietary reasoning model from SpaceXAI (xAI) that accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text, with a 500,000 token context window. xAI positions it as a model for coding, agentic software work, and knowledge tasks, and states it was trained in the company's Memphis data centers on datasets spanning science, engineering, and mathematics. Its reinforcement learning stage covers hundreds of thousands of multi step software engineering tasks scored by automated checks and model based grading, and training is reported to have run on tens of thousands of NVIDIA GB300 GPUs using an asynchronous scheme in which multi hour agentic rollouts continue while learning proceeds in parallel, targeting long horizon autonomous operation rather than single turn inference.
For vision, the model consumes JPEG and PNG images in any order relative to text prompts, covering visual question answering, description of chart and document imagery, and reading text rendered inside a scene. Reasoning effort is configurable, and the model supports function calling and structured outputs, so image inputs can be interleaved with tool calls inside agent loops. xAI has not published a technical report, architecture details, or parameter count, and reported mixture of experts sizing figures come from secondary coverage rather than official documentation.
Qwen3.5-27B is a multimodal dense hybrid model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team and released in February 2026 as a high-precision entry in the Qwen3.5 "Medium" series. Unlike its Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) siblings, the 27B model utilizes a dense architecture combining Gated Delta Networks with a feed-forward structure, activating its full parameter suite for every inference to maximize reliability. This design provides the highest instruction-following and coding accuracy in its class, with a notable IFEval score of 95.0. The model features a native 262K-token context window, extensible to 1M tokens via YaRN (RoPE scaling), and is released under the Apache-2.0 license.
Optimized for agentic workflows, Qwen3.5-27B employs an early-fusion architecture that treats visual and textual data as a unified stream for deep cross-modal reasoning. This unified approach allows the model to excel in technical analysis and software engineering, matching GPT-5-mini with a 72.4% score on SWE-bench Verified. While the larger MoE variants in the family lead in raw knowledge benchmarks, the 27B model offers a stable and high-density alternative for structured data extraction and spatial perception, contributing to the Qwen3.5 family’s generational leap in OCR accuracy over the previous Qwen3-VL series.