Roboflow

GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 27B

Compare GPT-6 Sol and Qwen3.8 27B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.

Compare GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 27B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-6 Sol
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.8 27B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 27B on Vision Evals

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on all 4 Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Counting, where GPT-6 Sol leads 76.6% to 64.9%.

Overall, GPT-6 Sol averages 76.9% (#12 of 63) against 69.5% (#23 of 63) for Qwen3.8 27B.

Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper ($0.0009 vs $0.0074 per sample), while GPT-6 Sol is faster (10.2s vs 18.0s per sample).

GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 27B

GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 27B Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 16, 2026

PropertyGPT-6 SolQwen3.8 27B
OrganizationOpenAIQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateSep 2026Aug 2026
Context Window1.1M262K
Parametersundisclosed27.78B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsfree for commercial use
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$0.240
Output $/1M$10.00$2.20
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Promptable Concept SegmentationDemoNot listed
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
76.9%
69.5%
4/5 tasks
Quantizationsself-hosted
BF1669.5%FP868.7%AWQ-INT469.5%hardware →
Avg cost / sample$0.0074$0.0009
Avg speed / sample10.20s17.99s
By task
Object Detection (low)
74.7%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.1 to 75.5
$0.011
65.7%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.6 to 66.5
$0
Object Detection (high)
76.4%
±1.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.0 to 77.4
$0.022
66.1%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.9 to 67.8
$0
Counting (low)
76.6%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.3 to 78.4
$0.0039
64.9%
±4.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.8 to 68.9
$0
Counting (high)
77.5%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 78.4
$0.0070
68.0%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 70.3
$0
Identification (low)
93.8%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 93.8
$0.0027
85.4%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 90.6
$0
Identification (high)
92.7%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8
$0.0036
87.5%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 90.6
$0
OCR (low)
66.7%
$0.0077
–
by category
Single value
45.6%
Transcription
88.3%
Structured JSON
83.4%
Text localization
65.7%
OCR (high)
68.8%
$0.018
–
by category
Single value
47.4%
Transcription
91.0%
Structured JSON
85.3%
Text localization
68.7%
Reasoning (low)
72.6%
±3.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 69.5 to 76.8
$0.0037
62.0%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.3 to 64.2
$0
Reasoning (high)
77.7%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 76.8 to 78.8
$0.0061
66.0%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.6 to 66.9
$0

GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 27B: Overview

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from OpenAI, released on September 22, 2026 alongside GPT-6 Luna as an efficiency-oriented tier of the GPT-6 family that began with GPT-6 Astra. OpenAI states that Sol and Luna are trained with methods similar to those used for Astra, carrying the same work on professional tasks, factuality, coding, computer use, and alignment into models that run faster. Sol accepts text and image input and returns text output, and OpenAI documents a context window of roughly one million tokens together with a knowledge cutoff of April 20, 2026.

The model targets complex coding and agentic workflows and exposes a configurable reasoning effort setting with levels of none, low, medium, high, xhigh, and max, which trades latency and token consumption against answer quality. OpenAI reports results including 33.2% on AutomationBench at xhigh effort and 56.4% on Agents' Last Exam at max effort, while its reported DeepSWE and OSWorld 2.0 figures of 68.8% and 64.4% fall below those of the earlier GPT-5.6 Sol. Its vision behavior covers image understanding tasks such as visual question answering, captioning, document and chart interpretation, and text recognition.

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.8-27B is a dense vision-language model of roughly 27.78 billion parameters from Alibaba's Qwen team, built on the architectural foundation established by the Qwen3.5 generation. It takes interleaved text, image, and video input through an integrated vision encoder and produces text, covering document and chart understanding, visual question answering, front-end code generation from visual references, and agentic computer-use workflows. The decoder is a hybrid stack of 64 layers that repeats a pattern of three Gated DeltaNet linear-attention blocks, each followed by a feed-forward block, then one grouped-query full-attention block, so only a quarter of the layers maintain a conventional key-value cache. Native context length is 262,144 tokens.

Post-training targets long-horizon agentic work, and the model exposes per-request thinking control that lets callers switch reasoning traces on or off and choose a reasoning effort level. Multi-token prediction weights are trained alongside the main network for speculative decoding. Qwen reports improvements over Qwen3.6-27B on agentic and multimodal evaluations including Terminal-Bench 2.1, OSWorld-Verified, and SWE-bench Multimodal, with additional results on MathVision, CharXiv, and an internal Vision2Web suite.