Roboflow

GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B

Compare GPT-6 Sol and Qwen3.5 35B A3B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-6 Sol
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 35B A3B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B on Vision Evals

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on all 4 Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where GPT-6 Sol leads 74.7% to 52.9%.

Overall, GPT-6 Sol averages 76.9% (#12 of 63) against 62.5% (#32 of 63) for Qwen3.5 35B A3B.

Qwen3.5 35B A3B is cheaper ($0.0016 vs $0.0074 per sample), while GPT-6 Sol is faster (10.2s vs 31.9s per sample).

GPT-6 SolQwen3.5 35B A3B

GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 13, 2026

PropertyGPT-6 SolQwen3.5 35B A3B
OrganizationOpenAIQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateSep 2026Feb 2026
Context Window1.1M262K
Parametersundisclosed35B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsfree for commercial use
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$0.150
Output $/1M$10.00$1.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoSupported
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoSupported
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Promptable Concept SegmentationDemoNot listed
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
76.9%
62.5%
4/5 tasks
Quantizationsself-hosted
FP859.8%GPTQ-INT462.5%hardware →
Avg cost / sample$0.0074$0.0016
Avg speed / sample10.20s31.88s
By task
Object Detection (low)
74.7%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.1 to 75.5
$0.011
52.9%
±3.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 49.5 to 55.9
$0
Object Detection (high)
76.4%
±1.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.0 to 77.4
$0.022
–
Counting (low)
76.6%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.3 to 78.4
$0.0039
62.6%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.8 to 64.9
$0
Counting (high)
77.5%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 78.4
$0.0070
–
Identification (low)
93.8%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 93.8
$0.0027
80.2%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 81.3
$0
Identification (high)
92.7%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8
$0.0036
–
OCR (low)
66.7%
$0.0077
–
by category
Single value
45.6%
Transcription
88.3%
Structured JSON
83.4%
Text localization
65.7%
OCR (high)
68.8%
$0.018
–
by category
Single value
47.4%
Transcription
91.0%
Structured JSON
85.3%
Text localization
68.7%
Reasoning (low)
72.6%
±3.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 69.5 to 76.8
$0.0037
54.1%
±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 53.6 to 54.3
$0
Reasoning (high)
77.7%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 76.8 to 78.8
$0.0061
–

GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Overview

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from OpenAI, released on September 22, 2026 alongside GPT-6 Luna as an efficiency-oriented tier of the GPT-6 family that began with GPT-6 Astra. OpenAI states that Sol and Luna are trained with methods similar to those used for Astra, carrying the same work on professional tasks, factuality, coding, computer use, and alignment into models that run faster. Sol accepts text and image input and returns text output, and OpenAI documents a context window of roughly one million tokens together with a knowledge cutoff of April 20, 2026.

The model targets complex coding and agentic workflows and exposes a configurable reasoning effort setting with levels of none, low, medium, high, xhigh, and max, which trades latency and token consumption against answer quality. OpenAI reports results including 33.2% on AutomationBench at xhigh effort and 56.4% on Agents' Last Exam at max effort, while its reported DeepSWE and OSWorld 2.0 figures of 68.8% and 64.4% fall below those of the earlier GPT-5.6 Sol. Its vision behavior covers image understanding tasks such as visual question answering, captioning, document and chart interpretation, and text recognition.

Qwen3.5 35B A3B

The Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is a native vision-language model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team, released on February 24, 2026, as a high-efficiency entry in the Qwen 3.5 family. It utilizes a sophisticated hybrid architecture that integrates Gated Delta Networks with a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) system. While the model houses 35 billion total parameters, its routing mechanism activates only 8 routed experts and 1 shared expert per token, totaling approximately 3 billion active parameters. This design achieves cross-generational parity with the previous flagship Qwen3-235B dense model, delivering comparable reasoning and multimodal intelligence with significantly reduced inference latency and compute requirements. Available under the Apache 2.0 license, it is released in both base and instruction-tuned variants for seamless integration with open-source stacks like vLLM and Hugging Face Transformers.

Designed for the emerging era of agentic AI, the model utilizes a unified multimodal foundation built through early-fusion training. This approach allows it to outperform the prior Qwen3-VL series in spatial grounding, document analysis, and UI/GUI interaction. It features a native context window of 262,144 tokens, which is extensible up to 1,010,000 tokensvia RoPE scaling, and provides global support for 201 languages and dialects. This combination of a compact active parameter count and frontier-level visual comprehension makes it a versatile tool for developers requiring a balance of high-throughput speed and sophisticated visual reasoning for long-context workflows.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, GPT-6 Sol performed better. It scores higher on all 4 vision tasks and averages 76.9% (#12 of 63) against 62.5% (#32 of 63) for Qwen3.5 35B A3B. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

Yes. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark at low effort, GPT-6 Sol leads with 74.7% against 52.9%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Qwen3.5 35B A3B is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0016 per sample against $0.0074. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

GPT-6 Sol is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 10.2s per inference against 31.9s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.