Roboflow

GPT-6 Astra vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Compare GPT-6 Astra and Muse Glimmer 30B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, OCR, Open Prompt, Classification, and Image Captioning.

Compare GPT-6 Astra vs Muse Glimmer 30B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-6 Astra
Run to compare this model.
MetaMuse Glimmer 30B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GPT-6 Astra vs Muse Glimmer 30B on Vision Evals

GPT-6 Astra scores higher on all five Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where GPT-6 Astra leads 82.1% to 41.0%.

Overall, GPT-6 Astra averages 83.4% (#2 of 63) against 61.4% (#34 of 63) for Muse Glimmer 30B.

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper ($0.0013 vs $0.034 per sample), while GPT-6 Astra is faster (9.9s vs 10.6s per sample).

GPT-6 AstraMuse Glimmer 30B

GPT-6 Astra vs Muse Glimmer 30B Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 23, 2026

PropertyGPT-6 AstraMuse Glimmer 30B
OrganizationOpenAIMeta
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateSep 2026Aug 2026
Context Window1.1M131K
ParametersUndisclosed29.6B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsfree for commercial use
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$10.00$0.300
Output $/1M$50.00$1.20
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Promptable Concept SegmentationDemoNot listed
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
83.4%
61.4%
Avg cost / sample$0.034$0.0013
Avg speed / sample9.94s10.60s
By task
Object Detection (low)
82.1%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.0 to 82.7
$0.050
41.0%
$0.0017
Object Detection (high)
83.6%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.8 to 84.5
$0.101
–
Counting (low)
80.2%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 81.1
$0.018
66.2%
$0.0007
Counting (high)
81.1%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.7 to 82.4
$0.028
–
Identification (low)
89.6%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6
$0.013
81.3%
$0.0005
Identification (high)
92.7%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8
$0.014
–
OCR (low)
77.8%
$0.034
60.7%
$0.0013
by category
Single value
60.9%
Transcription
95.9%
Structured JSON
91.8%
Text localization
75.5%
Single value
54.4%
Transcription
82.9%
Structured JSON
80.2%
Text localization
14.8%
OCR (high)
77.6%
$0.084
60.1%
$0.0033
by category
Single value
59.6%
Transcription
97.5%
Structured JSON
91.7%
Text localization
76.8%
Single value
54.4%
Transcription
78.4%
Structured JSON
80.0%
Text localization
13.7%
Reasoning (low)
87.2%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.1 to 88.1
$0.016
57.6%
$0.0009
Reasoning (high)
91.2%
±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.7 to 91.4
$0.021
62.9%
$0.0026

GPT-6 Astra vs Muse Glimmer 30B: Overview

GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from OpenAI that accepts text and image input and produces text output. It is positioned as the company's flagship system for long-horizon end-to-end work spanning complex reasoning, software engineering, computer use, browsing, research and document creation. The model exposes a graduated reasoning effort control with low, medium, high, xhigh and max settings, and it accepts a change to that setting partway through a conversation rather than only at request time. It launches as a single tier with no smaller mini or nano variants, carries a context window of roughly 1.05 million tokens with a maximum output of 128,000 tokens, and reports a knowledge cutoff of April 30, 2026.

OpenAI reports evaluation results across agentic, scientific and security benchmarks, including 96.0% on GPQA Diamond, 64.6% on Terminal-Bench Science, 72.6% on OSWorld 2.0, and a perfect score on ExploitBench, along with near saturation on FrontierMath Tier 4 and ARC-AGI-3. The model supports computer use, structured outputs, streaming, programmatic tool calling, multi-agent orchestration, prompt caching and persisted reasoning, and it keeps earlier context windows searchable so it can recover requirements or tool outputs from previous turns. OpenAI describes Astra as the first of its models to cross the Critical cybersecurity capability threshold under its Preparedness Framework.

Muse Glimmer 30B

Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense vision language model from Meta built for long-horizon agentic work on local hardware. The architecture pairs a 52-layer causal text decoder with a roughly 1.8B parameter ViT-G/14 perception encoder for about 29.6 billion parameters in total, and it accepts interleaved text and image input so an agent can interpret screenshots, charts, and documents alongside conversation. The decoder uses grouped-query attention with 32 query heads and 2 key-value heads, a repeating pattern of three sliding-window local attention layers followed by one global layer, SwiGLU feed-forward blocks, and rotary position embeddings applied on the local layers, supporting a trained context of 131,072 tokens.

Meta describes the model as distilled from the larger Muse Spark and trained and evaluated around agentic behavior: end-to-end task completion, schema-accurate tool calling, multi-step reasoning across extended workflows, and recovery when a tool call returns an unexpected result. Reasoning effort is selectable across low, medium, high, and xhigh settings, and the model emits channel-scoped reasoning traces together with XML style tool calls rather than JSON, which requires parsers specific to this family. A companion block-diffusion drafter head predicts blocks of 16 tokens per forward pass for speculative decoding, with the main model verifying the proposals in parallel.