GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.5
Compare GPT-6 Astra and Grok 4.5 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, OCR, Open Prompt, Classification, and Image Captioning.
Compare GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.5 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.5 on Vision Evals
GPT-6 Astra scores higher on all five Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Object Detection, where GPT-6 Astra leads 82.1% to 19.0%.
Overall, GPT-6 Astra averages 83.4% (#2 of 63) against 55.3% (#46 of 63) for Grok 4.5.
Grok 4.5 is cheaper ($0.0078 vs $0.034 per sample), while GPT-6 Astra is faster (9.9s vs 16.4s per sample).
GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.5 Comparison Table
Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 17, 2026
| Property | GPT-6 Astra | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | OpenAI | SpaceXAI |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Sep 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.1M | 500K |
| Parameters | Undisclosed | Unknown |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | commercial use per vendor terms | commercial use per vendor terms |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $10.00 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $50.00 | $6.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Image Tagging | Supported | Supported |
| Multi-Label Classification | Supported | Supported |
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | Supported | Supported |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Promptable Concept Segmentation | Demo | Not listed |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | Supported | Supported |
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | Supported | Supported |
| Multimodal Vision | Supported | Supported |
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 83.4% | 55.3% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.034 | $0.0078 |
| Avg speed / sample | 9.94s | 16.41s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 82.1% ±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.0 to 82.7 | 19.0% ±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 18.0 to 19.6 |
| Object Detection (high) | 83.6% ±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.8 to 84.5 | 17.8% ±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 17.5 to 18.0 |
| Counting (low) | 80.2% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 81.1 | 59.5% ±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.4 to 62.2 |
| Counting (high) | 81.1% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.7 to 82.4 | 57.7% ±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.0 to 60.8 |
| Identification (low) | 89.6% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6 | 83.3% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4 |
| Identification (high) | 92.7% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8 | 85.4% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 87.5 |
| OCR (low) | 77.8% | 57.1% |
| by category |
|
|
| OCR (high) | 77.6% | 57.5% |
| by category |
|
|
| Reasoning (low) | 87.2% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.1 to 88.1 | 57.6% ±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.6 to 58.9 |
| Reasoning (high) | 91.2% ±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.7 to 91.4 | 59.8% ±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 57.0 to 62.3 |
GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.5: Overview
GPT-6 Astra is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from OpenAI that accepts text and image input and produces text output. It is positioned as the company's flagship system for long-horizon end-to-end work spanning complex reasoning, software engineering, computer use, browsing, research and document creation. The model exposes a graduated reasoning effort control with low, medium, high, xhigh and max settings, and it accepts a change to that setting partway through a conversation rather than only at request time. It launches as a single tier with no smaller mini or nano variants, carries a context window of roughly 1.05 million tokens with a maximum output of 128,000 tokens, and reports a knowledge cutoff of April 30, 2026.
OpenAI reports evaluation results across agentic, scientific and security benchmarks, including 96.0% on GPQA Diamond, 64.6% on Terminal-Bench Science, 72.6% on OSWorld 2.0, and a perfect score on ExploitBench, along with near saturation on FrontierMath Tier 4 and ARC-AGI-3. The model supports computer use, structured outputs, streaming, programmatic tool calling, multi-agent orchestration, prompt caching and persisted reasoning, and it keeps earlier context windows searchable so it can recover requirements or tool outputs from previous turns. OpenAI describes Astra as the first of its models to cross the Critical cybersecurity capability threshold under its Preparedness Framework.
Grok 4.5 is a proprietary reasoning model from SpaceXAI (xAI) that accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text, with a 500,000 token context window. xAI positions it as a model for coding, agentic software work, and knowledge tasks, and states it was trained in the company's Memphis data centers on datasets spanning science, engineering, and mathematics. Its reinforcement learning stage covers hundreds of thousands of multi step software engineering tasks scored by automated checks and model based grading, and training is reported to have run on tens of thousands of NVIDIA GB300 GPUs using an asynchronous scheme in which multi hour agentic rollouts continue while learning proceeds in parallel, targeting long horizon autonomous operation rather than single turn inference.
For vision, the model consumes JPEG and PNG images in any order relative to text prompts, covering visual question answering, description of chart and document imagery, and reading text rendered inside a scene. Reasoning effort is configurable, and the model supports function calling and structured outputs, so image inputs can be interleaved with tool calls inside agent loops. xAI has not published a technical report, architecture details, or parameter count, and reported mixture of experts sizing figures come from secondary coverage rather than official documentation.