Roboflow

GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.5

Compare GPT-6 Astra and Grok 4.5 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, OCR, Open Prompt, Classification, and Image Captioning.

Compare GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.5 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-6 Astra
Run to compare this model.
GrokGrok 4.5
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.5 on Vision Evals

GPT-6 Astra scores higher on all five Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where GPT-6 Astra leads 82.1% to 19.0%.

Overall, GPT-6 Astra averages 83.4% (#2 of 63) against 55.3% (#46 of 63) for Grok 4.5.

Grok 4.5 is cheaper ($0.0078 vs $0.034 per sample), while GPT-6 Astra is faster (9.9s vs 16.4s per sample).

GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.5

GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.5 Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 23, 2026

PropertyGPT-6 AstraGrok 4.5
OrganizationOpenAISpaceXAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateSep 2026Jul 2026
Context Window1.1M500K
ParametersUndisclosedUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$10.00$2.00
Output $/1M$50.00$6.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Promptable Concept SegmentationDemoNot listed
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
83.4%
55.3%
Avg cost / sample$0.034$0.0078
Avg speed / sample9.94s16.41s
By task
Object Detection (low)
82.1%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.0 to 82.7
$0.050
19.0%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 18.0 to 19.6
$0.011
Object Detection (high)
83.6%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.8 to 84.5
$0.101
17.8%
±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 17.5 to 18.0
$0.020
Counting (low)
80.2%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 81.1
$0.018
59.5%
±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.4 to 62.2
$0.0065
Counting (high)
81.1%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.7 to 82.4
$0.028
57.7%
±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.0 to 60.8
$0.012
Identification (low)
89.6%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6
$0.013
83.3%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4
$0.0046
Identification (high)
92.7%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8
$0.014
85.4%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 87.5
$0.0067
OCR (low)
77.8%
$0.034
57.1%
$0.0065
by category
Single value
60.9%
Transcription
95.9%
Structured JSON
91.8%
Text localization
75.5%
Single value
47.8%
Transcription
85.4%
Structured JSON
80.3%
Text localization
6.1%
OCR (high)
77.6%
$0.084
57.5%
$0.013
by category
Single value
59.6%
Transcription
97.5%
Structured JSON
91.7%
Text localization
76.8%
Single value
47.8%
Transcription
86.1%
Structured JSON
80.9%
Text localization
7.0%
Reasoning (low)
87.2%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.1 to 88.1
$0.016
57.6%
±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.6 to 58.9
$0.0082
Reasoning (high)
91.2%
±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.7 to 91.4
$0.021
59.8%
±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 57.0 to 62.3
$0.019

GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.5: Overview

GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from OpenAI that accepts text and image input and produces text output. It is positioned as the company's flagship system for long-horizon end-to-end work spanning complex reasoning, software engineering, computer use, browsing, research and document creation. The model exposes a graduated reasoning effort control with low, medium, high, xhigh and max settings, and it accepts a change to that setting partway through a conversation rather than only at request time. It launches as a single tier with no smaller mini or nano variants, carries a context window of roughly 1.05 million tokens with a maximum output of 128,000 tokens, and reports a knowledge cutoff of April 30, 2026.

OpenAI reports evaluation results across agentic, scientific and security benchmarks, including 96.0% on GPQA Diamond, 64.6% on Terminal-Bench Science, 72.6% on OSWorld 2.0, and a perfect score on ExploitBench, along with near saturation on FrontierMath Tier 4 and ARC-AGI-3. The model supports computer use, structured outputs, streaming, programmatic tool calling, multi-agent orchestration, prompt caching and persisted reasoning, and it keeps earlier context windows searchable so it can recover requirements or tool outputs from previous turns. OpenAI describes Astra as the first of its models to cross the Critical cybersecurity capability threshold under its Preparedness Framework.

Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5 is a proprietary reasoning model from SpaceXAI (xAI) that accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text, with a 500,000 token context window. xAI positions it as a model for coding, agentic software work, and knowledge tasks, and states it was trained in the company's Memphis data centers on datasets spanning science, engineering, and mathematics. Its reinforcement learning stage covers hundreds of thousands of multi step software engineering tasks scored by automated checks and model based grading, and training is reported to have run on tens of thousands of NVIDIA GB300 GPUs using an asynchronous scheme in which multi hour agentic rollouts continue while learning proceeds in parallel, targeting long horizon autonomous operation rather than single turn inference.

For vision, the model consumes JPEG and PNG images in any order relative to text prompts, covering visual question answering, description of chart and document imagery, and reading text rendered inside a scene. Reasoning effort is configurable, and the model supports function calling and structured outputs, so image inputs can be interleaved with tool calls inside agent loops. xAI has not published a technical report, architecture details, or parameter count, and reported mixture of experts sizing figures come from secondary coverage rather than official documentation.