GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Compare GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3.5 35B A3B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.
Compare GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B on Vision Evals
GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher on all 4 Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Object Detection, where GPT-5.6 Luna leads 61.0% to 52.9%.
Overall, GPT-5.6 Luna averages 64.7% (#27 of 61) against 62.5% (#30 of 61) for Qwen3.5 35B A3B.
GPT-5.6 Luna is both cheaper ($0.0011 vs $0.0016 per sample) and faster (8.6s vs 31.9s per sample).
GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B Comparison Table
Evals updated October 8, 2026Pricing updated October 8, 2026
| Property | GPT-5.6 Luna | Qwen3.5 35B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Category | closed | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Jul 2026 | Feb 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.5M | 262K |
| Parameters | Unknown | 35B |
| License | Proprietary | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $1.20 | $1.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Classification | Demo | Supported |
| Document Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Image Tagging | Supported | Supported |
| Multi-Label Classification | Supported | Supported |
| Object Detection | Demo | Supported |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | Supported | Supported |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | Supported | Supported |
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | Supported | Supported |
| Multimodal Vision | Supported | Supported |
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 64.7% | 62.5% 4/5 tasks |
| Quantizationsself-hosted | ||
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0011 | $0.0016 |
| Avg speed / sample | 8.60s | 31.88s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 61.0% ±1.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.9 to 62.2 | 52.9% ±3.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 49.5 to 55.9 |
| Object Detection (high) | 62.3% ±1.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 61.4 to 63.8 | – |
| Counting (low) | 67.1% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 68.9 | 62.6% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.8 to 64.9 |
| Counting (high) | 70.7% ±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 73.0 | – |
| Identification (low) | 83.3% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4 | 80.2% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 81.3 |
| Identification (high) | 84.4% ±6.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 90.6 | – |
| OCR (low) | 51.8% | – |
| by category |
| |
| OCR (high) | 55.7% | – |
| by category |
| |
| Reasoning (low) | 60.5% ±5.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.0 to 64.9 | 54.1% ±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 53.6 to 54.3 |
| Reasoning (high) | 65.6% ±3.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.9 to 68.2 | – |
GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Overview
GPT-5.6 Luna is the fastest and most cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes Sol (the flagship tier) and Terra (the balanced mid-tier). Introduced under a new naming convention where the generation number (5.6) and a durable capability tier name (Luna, Terra, Sol) together define each model, Luna occupies the lightweight end of the family and is designed for high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads such as summarization, drafting, autocomplete, classification, and routine automation. The GPT-5.6 family as a whole advances capabilities in software engineering, computer use, professional knowledge work, scientific research, and cybersecurity, with all three tiers rated at the "High" capability level under OpenAI's Preparedness Framework for both cybersecurity and biological/chemical risk domains.
GPT-5.6 Luna supports multimodal input and function calling, and shares the family's 1.5 million token context window. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Luna scores 82.5%, and on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index it outperforms comparable models at roughly one-quarter the estimated cost of higher-tier alternatives. Luna supports the GPT-5.6 prompt caching scheme, which introduces explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life. The model was previewed on June 26, 2026 to a limited group of trusted partners via the OpenAI API and Codex, with general availability rolling out on July 9, 2026 across ChatGPT, Codex, and the API.
The Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is a native vision-language model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team, released on February 24, 2026, as a high-efficiency entry in the Qwen 3.5 family. It utilizes a sophisticated hybrid architecture that integrates Gated Delta Networks with a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) system. While the model houses 35 billion total parameters, its routing mechanism activates only 8 routed experts and 1 shared expert per token, totaling approximately 3 billion active parameters. This design achieves cross-generational parity with the previous flagship Qwen3-235B dense model, delivering comparable reasoning and multimodal intelligence with significantly reduced inference latency and compute requirements. Available under the Apache 2.0 license, it is released in both base and instruction-tuned variants for seamless integration with open-source stacks like vLLM and Hugging Face Transformers.
Designed for the emerging era of agentic AI, the model utilizes a unified multimodal foundation built through early-fusion training. This approach allows it to outperform the prior Qwen3-VL series in spatial grounding, document analysis, and UI/GUI interaction. It features a native context window of 262,144 tokens, which is extensible up to 1,010,000 tokensvia RoPE scaling, and provides global support for 201 languages and dialects. This combination of a compact active parameter count and frontier-level visual comprehension makes it a versatile tool for developers requiring a balance of high-throughput speed and sophisticated visual reasoning for long-context workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions
On Roboflow's Vision Evals, GPT-5.6 Luna performed better. It scores higher on all 4 vision tasks and averages 64.7% (#27 of 61) against 62.5% (#30 of 61) for Qwen3.5 35B A3B. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.
Yes. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark at low effort, GPT-5.6 Luna leads with 61.0% against 52.9%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0011 per sample against $0.0016. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.
GPT-5.6 Luna is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 8.6s per inference against 31.9s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.