Roboflow

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Kimi K3

Compare GPT-5.6 Luna and Kimi K3 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Classification, Image Captioning, OCR, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.

Compare GPT-5.6 Luna vs Kimi K3 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Luna
Run to compare this model.
MoonshotAIKimi K3
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

MoonshotAI

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Kimi K3 on Vision Evals

GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher on 3 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Counting, where GPT-5.6 Luna leads 66.2% to 46.0%.

Overall, GPT-5.6 Luna averages 71.5% (#13 of 25) against 66.5% (#17 of 25) for Kimi K3.

GPT-5.6 Luna is both cheaper ($0.0005 vs $0.011 per sample) and faster (6.5s vs 12.7s per sample).

GPT-5.6 LunaKimi K3

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Kimi K3 Comparison Table

Evals updated August 6, 2026Pricing updated August 11, 2026

PropertyGPT-5.6 LunaKimi K3
OrganizationOpenAIMoonshot AI
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJul 2026Jul 2026
Context Window1.5M1.0M
Parameters2.8T
LicenseProprietaryModified MIT
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.100$3.00
Output $/1M$0.600$15.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
71.5%
66.5%
Avg cost / sample$0.0005$0.011
Avg speed / sample6.55s12.71s
By task
Object Detection
59.9%
$0.0008
51.9%
$0.020
Counting
66.2%
$0.0003
46.0%
$0.0046
Identification
78.1%
$0.0002
81.3%
$0.0041
OCR
88.4%
$0.0006
93.0%
$0.0094
Data Extraction
81.4%
$0.0002
84.5%
$0.0046
Reasoning (low)
55.0%
$0.0003
42.4%
$0.0044
Reasoning (high)
60.9%
$0.0007
74.2%
$0.037

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Kimi K3: Overview

GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is the fastest and most cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes Sol (the flagship tier) and Terra (the balanced mid-tier). Introduced under a new naming convention where the generation number (5.6) and a durable capability tier name (Luna, Terra, Sol) together define each model, Luna occupies the lightweight end of the family and is designed for high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads such as summarization, drafting, autocomplete, classification, and routine automation. The GPT-5.6 family as a whole advances capabilities in software engineering, computer use, professional knowledge work, scientific research, and cybersecurity, with all three tiers rated at the "High" capability level under OpenAI's Preparedness Framework for both cybersecurity and biological/chemical risk domains.

GPT-5.6 Luna supports multimodal input and function calling, and shares the family's 1.5 million token context window. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Luna scores 82.5%, and on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index it outperforms comparable models at roughly one-quarter the estimated cost of higher-tier alternatives. Luna is priced at $1 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens, with cached input reads at $0.10 per million tokens under the GPT-5.6 prompt caching scheme, which introduces explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life. The model was previewed on June 26, 2026 to a limited group of trusted partners via the OpenAI API and Codex, with general availability rolling out on July 9, 2026 across ChatGPT, Codex, and the API.

Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is a sparse Mixture-of-Experts large language model developed by Moonshot AI, with 2.8 trillion total parameters and a 1-million-token context window. The model activates 16 out of 896 experts per token using the Stable LatentMoE framework, and is built on two architectural innovations: Kimi Delta Attention (KDA), a hybrid linear attention mechanism that enables up to 6.3x faster decoding in long-context settings, and Attention Residuals (AttnRes), which selectively retrieves representations across model depth and delivers roughly 25% higher training efficiency. Together with refined training and data recipes, these structural advances yield approximately 2.5x better overall scaling efficiency compared to its predecessor Kimi K2. The model applies quantization-aware training from the supervised fine-tuning stage onward, using MXFP4 weights with MXFP8 activations for hardware compatibility. Thinking mode is always enabled at launch, with reasoning effort configurable via the reasoning_effort field.

Kimi K3 supports native visual understanding alongside text, accepting image inputs for tasks that combine software engineering and visual reasoning. It targets long-horizon coding, knowledge work, and agentic workflows, and ships in two variants: K3 Max for general chat and agent tasks, and K3 Swarm Max for large-scale parallel processing across many coordinated sub-agents. The model is compatible with the OpenAI SDK via an OpenAI-compatible API. Full model weights are scheduled for release by July 27, 2026 under a Modified MIT license, following the open-weight pattern established by the Kimi K2 model family. A technical report with full architecture, training, and evaluation details is expected to accompany the weights release.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, GPT-5.6 Luna performed slightly better overall. The two split the six vision tasks 3 to 3, but GPT-5.6 Luna averages 71.5% (#13 of 25) against 66.5% (#17 of 25) for Kimi K3. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

Yes. On the Vision Evals Counting benchmark, GPT-5.6 Luna leads with 66.2% against 46.0%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0005 per sample against $0.011. GPT-5.6 Luna is priced at $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output; Kimi K3 is priced at $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

GPT-5.6 Luna is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 6.5s per inference against 12.7s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image classification and image captioning in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.