Roboflow

GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Compare GPT-5.6 Luna and GPT-6.1 Sol side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Classification, Image Captioning, OCR, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.

Compare GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-6.1 Sol live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Luna
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-6.1 Sol
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-6.1 Sol on Vision Evals

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on all five Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is OCR, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 75.8% to 51.8%.

Overall, GPT-5.6 Luna averages 64.7% (#29 of 63) against 81.7% (#5 of 63) for GPT-6.1 Sol.

GPT-5.6 Luna is both cheaper ($0.0011 vs $0.0068 per sample) and faster (8.6s vs 12.8s per sample).

GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-6.1 Sol Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 17, 2026

PropertyGPT-5.6 LunaGPT-6.1 Sol
OrganizationOpenAIOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJul 2026Sep 2026
Context Window1.5M1.1M
ParametersUnknownundisclosed
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.200$2.00
Output $/1M$1.20$10.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Promptable Concept SegmentationNot listedDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
64.7%
81.7%
Avg cost / sample$0.0011$0.0068
Avg speed / sample8.60s12.82s
By task
Object Detection (low)
61.0%
±1.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.9 to 62.2
$0.0015
80.8%
±0.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.7 to 80.9
$0.010
Object Detection (high)
62.3%
±1.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 61.4 to 63.8
$0.0050
81.6%
±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.1 to 82.0
$0.022
Counting (low)
67.1%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 68.9
$0.0006
78.8%
±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 82.4
$0.0037
Counting (high)
70.7%
±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 73.0
$0.0015
80.2%
±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 77.0 to 83.8
$0.0057
Identification (low)
83.3%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4
$0.0004
89.6%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6
$0.0025
Identification (high)
84.4%
±6.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 90.6
$0.0007
88.5%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6
$0.0030
OCR (low)
51.8%
$0.0011
75.8%
$0.0069
by category
Single value
29.6%
Transcription
75.5%
Structured JSON
73.6%
Text localization
39.7%
Single value
58.3%
Transcription
95.7%
Structured JSON
89.5%
Text localization
74.4%
OCR (high)
55.7%
$0.0041
75.8%
$0.016
by category
Single value
33.0%
Transcription
83.5%
Structured JSON
77.0%
Text localization
43.8%
Single value
56.5%
Transcription
96.0%
Structured JSON
90.4%
Text localization
76.7%
Reasoning (low)
60.5%
±5.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.0 to 64.9
$0.0006
83.7%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.1 to 84.8
$0.0033
Reasoning (high)
65.6%
±3.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.9 to 68.2
$0.0015
88.7%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.4 to 91.4
$0.0042

GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-6.1 Sol: Overview

GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is the fastest and most cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes Sol (the flagship tier) and Terra (the balanced mid-tier). Introduced under a new naming convention where the generation number (5.6) and a durable capability tier name (Luna, Terra, Sol) together define each model, Luna occupies the lightweight end of the family and is designed for high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads such as summarization, drafting, autocomplete, classification, and routine automation. The GPT-5.6 family as a whole advances capabilities in software engineering, computer use, professional knowledge work, scientific research, and cybersecurity, with all three tiers rated at the "High" capability level under OpenAI's Preparedness Framework for both cybersecurity and biological/chemical risk domains.

GPT-5.6 Luna supports multimodal input and function calling, and shares the family's 1.5 million token context window. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Luna scores 82.5%, and on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index it outperforms comparable models at roughly one-quarter the estimated cost of higher-tier alternatives. Luna supports the GPT-5.6 prompt caching scheme, which introduces explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life. The model was previewed on June 26, 2026 to a limited group of trusted partners via the OpenAI API and Codex, with general availability rolling out on July 9, 2026 across ChatGPT, Codex, and the API.

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol is a reasoning model in OpenAI's GPT-6 series that accepts text and image input and returns text. It is an upgrade to GPT-6 Sol positioned to approach the intelligence of the larger GPT-6 Astra model on agentic coding, computer use, and professional knowledge work. The model exposes an adjustable reasoning effort control, ranging from low settings for simple turns to maximum settings for harder tasks, and can be driven with tool use enabled or disabled. It operates over a context window of roughly one million tokens and emits up to 128,000 output tokens in a single response, which supports long-running agent loops over large codebases and multi-document collections. Audio and video inputs are not supported.

On the visual side, the model is evaluated on GDP.pdf, a benchmark that asks professional questions about complex PDF documents containing tables, charts, diagrams, and fine-print details, and on OSWorld 2.0, which measures agents operating graphical computer applications. OpenAI reports that GPT-6.1 Sol performs on par with or better than GPT-6 Sol across its image input safety evaluations, and that the share of responses containing a factual error at low reasoning effort falls from 11.4 percent to 7.7 percent.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, GPT-6.1 Sol performed better. It scores higher on all five vision tasks and averages 81.7% (#5 of 63) against 64.7% (#29 of 63) for GPT-5.6 Luna. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals OCR benchmark at low effort, GPT-6.1 Sol leads with 75.8% against 51.8%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0011 per sample against $0.0068. GPT-5.6 Luna is priced at $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $1.20 per 1M output; GPT-6.1 Sol is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

GPT-5.6 Luna is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 8.6s per inference against 12.8s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image classification and image captioning in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.