Roboflow

GPT-5.4 vs GPT-5 Nano

Compare GPT-5.4 and GPT-5 Nano side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR, Image Captioning, Classification, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.

Compare GPT-5.4 vs GPT-5 Nano live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5.4
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-5 Nano
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

OpenAI

GPT-5.4 vs GPT-5 Nano: Overview

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 is a proprietary multimodal large language model developed by OpenAI and released on March 5, 2026. It is designed for professional workloads such as advanced software development, research, and agentic automation. The model combines the general reasoning capabilities of the GPT-5 series with software engineering improvements derived from GPT-5.3-Codex. In the API and Codex environments it supports context windows of up to 1 million tokens, enabling long-context reasoning and large-scale code or document workflows.

Compared with GPT-5.2, GPT-5.4 reduces false individual claims by 33% and lowers overall response errors by 18%, improving factual reliability across complex tasks. It is also the first general-purpose OpenAI release with native computer-use capabilities, allowing agents to interact with desktops, browsers, and external applications to complete multi-step workflows. The model family includes three variants: GPT-5.4 (standard), GPT-5.4 Pro for higher-performance workloads, and GPT-5.4 Thinking, a reasoning-oriented version in ChatGPT that presents an upfront plan before generating its response. The API also introduces a Tool Search system that allows models to retrieve tool definitions dynamically, reducing token usage in tool-heavy integrations.

GPT-5 Nano

GPT-5 Nano, released by OpenAI on August 7, 2025, is the smallest and most cost-efficient model in the GPT-5 family. Like its larger counterparts, it is multimodal—accepting text and images, supporting tool use, structured outputs, and reasoning—but it is optimized for speed, low latency, and affordability. It features input and output token limits of roughly 272K and 128K tokens respectively, enabling large-context processing even at its compact scale. Its knowledge cutoff is around May 2024, slightly earlier than the full GPT-5 model.

GPT-5 Nano is well-suited for high-volume or cost-sensitive deployments such as mobile apps, embedded AI systems, or rapid-response APIs. While it offers less depth on complex reasoning and coding tasks compared to GPT-5 Mini or Pro, it retains core multimodal and agentic capabilities, making it an attractive option where efficiency and scale matter more than maximum performance.

GPT-5.4 vs GPT-5 Nano Comparison Table

PropertyGPT-5.4GPT-5 Nano
OrganizationOpenAIOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Aug 2025
Context Window1.1M400K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.50$0.050
Output $/1M$15.00$0.400
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
77.61%
58.21%
Avg Response Time7.16s6.58s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.4K1.8K
Median output tokens108591
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0052$0.0003
Defect Detection
86.7%(13/15)
86.7%(13/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
66.7%(6/9)
Object Counting
40%(4/10)
0%(0/10)
Object Understanding
85.7%(12/14)
64.3%(9/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
57.9%(11/19)
OCR
Overall Score
79.48%
69%
Avg Response Time3.98s6.15s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens105122
Median output tokens95539
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0017$0.0002
Focused Scene OCR
75.8%(75/99)
64.6%(64/99)
Handwritten Math
60%(6/10)
40%(4/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
83.3%(25/30)
Text Recognition
83.3%(25/30)
70%(21/30)
VQA & Extraction
81.7%(49/60)
73.3%(44/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology