GPT-5.4 Nano vs Llama 4 Maverick
Compare GPT-5.4 Nano and Llama 4 Maverick side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR, Image Captioning, and Open Prompt.
Compare GPT-5.4 Nano vs Llama 4 Maverick live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
GPT-5.4 Nano vs Llama 4 Maverick: Overview
GPT-5.4 nano is a high-throughput model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, as the efficiency-optimized entry in the GPT-5.4 family. Engineered for cost-sensitive production environments and latency-critical workloads, it features an expanded 400,000-token context window that enables the processing of large document batches or extensive logs in a single pass. The model is primarily optimized for text-heavy operations, serving as a premier engine for high-volume classification, data extraction, ranking, and the orchestration of lightweight sub-agents where speed and low per-token costs are the primary requirements.
While it supports text and image inputs, GPT-5.4 nano is designed as a text-first worker rather than a specialized visual reasoning tool. In multi-model architectures, it is best utilized for structured text tasks and simple coding sub-tasks, leaving intensive vision reasoning and UI navigation to its sibling, GPT-5.4 mini. Compared to the previous GPT-5 nano, this version provides a significant leap in reliability for structured outputs and tool calling, making it a dependable and economical choice for developers building scalable, automated pipelines that require rapid execution at the edge of the GPT-5.4 ecosystem.
Llama 4 Maverick, introduced on April 5, 2025, is one of the first models in Meta’s Llama 4 family, designed as a natively multimodal model supporting text + image inputs with text outputs. It employs a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts, activating ~17B parameters per token out of a pool of ~400B total parameters. This design improves scalability, efficiency, and reasoning capacity. Maverick has a 1M-token context window, enabling it to handle large documents, extended conversations, and multimodal reasoning. Its knowledge cutoff is August 2024.
The model is released under the Llama 4 Community License and comes in both base and instruction-tuned (“Instruct”) versions. Maverick is widely deployed via Hugging Face, Google Vertex AI, Amazon Bedrock, and Oracle Cloud, making it one of the most accessible large open-weight models. However, it outputs text only (no image/audio generation) and, while input capacity is huge, output limits are typically much smaller. The MoE design also raises hardware demands, as maintaining 128 experts requires significant compute resources, and Meta’s license introduces restrictions around commercial-scale use.
GPT-5.4 Nano vs Llama 4 Maverick Comparison Table
| Property | GPT-5.4 Nano | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | OpenAI | Meta |
| Category | closed | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Mar 2026 | Apr 2025 |
| Context Window | 400K | 1.0M |
| Parameters | 400B | |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $1.25 | $0.600 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Object Detection | Demo | |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Classification | Demo | |
| Model Features | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Visual Understanding | ||
| Overall Score | 62.69% | 59.7% |
| Avg Response Time | 3.72s | 2.30s |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 1.4K | 2.4K |
| Median output tokens | 105 | 7 |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0004 | $0.0004 |
| Defect Detection | 80%(12/15) | 66.7%(10/15) |
| Document Understanding | 77.8%(7/9) | 66.7%(6/9) |
| Object Counting | 30%(3/10) | 30%(3/10) |
| Object Understanding | 64.3%(9/14) | 64.3%(9/14) |
| Spatial Understanding | 57.9%(11/19) | 63.2%(12/19) |
| OCR | ||
| Overall Score | 62.45% | 78.6% |
| Avg Response Time | 2.59s | 0.87s |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 105 | 472 |
| Median output tokens | 87 | 10 |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0001 | $0.0001 |
| Focused Scene OCR | 55.6%(55/99) | 76.8%(76/99) |
| Handwritten Math | 20%(2/10) | 60%(6/10) |
| License Plate Recognition | 83.3%(25/30) | 93.3%(28/30) |
| Text Recognition | 70%(21/30) | 83.3%(25/30) |
| VQA & Extraction | 66.7%(40/60) | 75%(45/60) |
Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology