Roboflow

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.8 27B

Compare GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.8 27B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Object Detection, Classification, Image Captioning, and OCR.

Compare GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.8 27B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5.4 Mini
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.8 27B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.8 27B on Vision Evals

Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on 5 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where Qwen3.8 27B leads 65.7% to 15.8%.

Overall, GPT-5.4 Mini averages 64.7% (#44 of 61) against 74.7% (#22 of 61) for Qwen3.8 27B.

Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper ($0.0009 vs $0.0030 per sample), while GPT-5.4 Mini is faster (5.3s vs 18.0s per sample).

GPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.8 27B

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.8 27B Comparison Table

Evals updated September 29, 2026Pricing updated September 29, 2026

PropertyGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.8 27B
OrganizationOpenAIQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Aug 2026
Context Window400K262K
Parameters27.78B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.750$0.025
Output $/1M$4.50$4.35
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
64.7%
74.7%
Quantizationsself-hosted
BF1674.6%FP873.9%AWQ-INT474.7%hardware →
Avg cost / sample$0.0030$0.0009
Avg speed / sample5.25s17.99s
By task
Object Detection (low)
15.8%
±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 15.3 to 16.1
$0.0044
65.7%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.6 to 66.5
$0
Object Detection (high)
16.6%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 15.8 to 17.4
$0.030
66.1%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.9 to 67.8
$0
Counting (low)
58.6%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 56.8 to 60.8
$0.0019
64.9%
±4.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.8 to 68.9
$0
Counting (high)
64.9%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.5 to 67.6
$0.0073
68.0%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 70.3
$0
Identification (low)
83.3%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4
$0.0013
85.4%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 90.6
$0
Identification (high)
82.3%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 84.4
$0.0055
87.5%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 90.6
$0
OCR (low)
89.5%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 88.1 to 90.6
$0.0042
92.2%
±1.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 91.1 to 93.4
$0
OCR (high)
89.0%
±1.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.7 to 91.2
$0.030
91.5%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.1 to 92.9
$0
Data Extraction (low)
84.2%
±2.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.5 to 86.6
$0.0014
78.0%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 77.3 to 79.4
$0
Data Extraction (high)
82.1%
±2.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.4 to 84.5
$0.0036
80.8%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.4 to 81.4
$0
Reasoning (low)
57.0%
±3.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.3 to 60.9
$0.0022
62.0%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.3 to 64.2
$0
Reasoning (high)
64.0%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.9 to 65.6
$0.0096
66.0%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.6 to 66.9
$0

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.8 27B: Overview

GPT-5.4 Mini

GPT-5.4 mini is a fast, cost-efficient model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, optimized for high-throughput workloads and subagent orchestration. It supports text and image inputs within a 400,000-token context window, making it ideal for processing extensive visual datasets and large codebases in a single request. Designed for low-latency production environments, the model integrates with key API features including function calling, web search, and tool-based computer use, allowing it to assist in automated workflows that require navigating digital interfaces.

Compared to the previous GPT-5 mini, this version runs more than twice as fast while approaching the performance levels of the flagship GPT-5.4 on reasoning and coding benchmarks. While the larger GPT-5.4 introduces native, state-of-the-art computer-use capabilities, GPT-5.4 mini provides a scalable alternative for interpreting screenshots and reasoning over dense UI layouts. For vision tasks on Playground, it excels at extracting structured information from visual documents and assisting in agentic tasks that involve real-time interpretation of software interfaces alongside text.

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.8-27B is a dense vision-language model of roughly 27.78 billion parameters from Alibaba's Qwen team, built on the architectural foundation established by the Qwen3.5 generation. It takes interleaved text, image, and video input through an integrated vision encoder and produces text, covering document and chart understanding, visual question answering, front-end code generation from visual references, and agentic computer-use workflows. The decoder is a hybrid stack of 64 layers that repeats a pattern of three Gated DeltaNet linear-attention blocks, each followed by a feed-forward block, then one grouped-query full-attention block, so only a quarter of the layers maintain a conventional key-value cache. Native context length is 262,144 tokens.

Post-training targets long-horizon agentic work, and the model exposes per-request thinking control that lets callers switch reasoning traces on or off and choose a reasoning effort level. Multi-token prediction weights are trained alongside the main network for speculative decoding. Qwen reports improvements over Qwen3.6-27B on agentic and multimodal evaluations including Terminal-Bench 2.1, OSWorld-Verified, and SWE-bench Multimodal, with additional results on MathVision, CharXiv, and an internal Vision2Web suite.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Qwen3.8 27B performed better. It scores higher on 5 of the six vision tasks and averages 74.7% (#22 of 61) against 64.7% (#44 of 61) for GPT-5.4 Mini. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark at low effort, Qwen3.8 27B leads with 65.7% against 15.8%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0009 per sample against $0.0030. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

GPT-5.4 Mini is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 5.3s per inference against 18.0s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for open prompts and object detection in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.