Roboflow

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.8 27B

Compare GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.8 27B side-by-side.

Compare GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.8 27B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.

Models in this comparison

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.8 27B on Vision Evals

GPT-5.4 Mini scores higher on 4 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where Qwen3.8 27B leads 54.5% to 16.1%.

Overall, GPT-5.4 Mini averages 63.5% (#27 of 30) against 61.2% (#29 of 30) for Qwen3.8 27B.

Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper ($0.0018 vs $0.0030 per sample), while GPT-5.4 Mini is faster (5.3s vs 7.3s per sample).

GPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.8 27B

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.8 27B Comparison Table

Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 15, 2026

PropertyGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.8 27B
OrganizationOpenAIQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Aug 2026
Context Window400K262K
Parameters27.78B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.750$0.450
Output $/1M$4.50$3.20
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
OCRDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
63.5%
61.2%
Avg cost / sample$0.0030$0.0018
Avg speed / sample5.35s7.33s
By task
Object Detection
16.1%
$0.0044
54.5%
$0.0036
Counting
60.8%
$0.0019
41.9%
$0.0005
Identification
78.1%
$0.0013
78.1%
$0.0005
OCR
88.1%
$0.0042
81.4%
$0.0019
Data Extraction
82.5%
$0.0014
79.4%
$0.0005
Reasoning (low)
55.6%
$0.0023
31.8%
$0.0005
Reasoning (high)
62.9%
$0.0081
62.3%
$0.0087

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.8 27B: Overview

GPT-5.4 Mini

GPT-5.4 mini is a fast, cost-efficient model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, optimized for high-throughput workloads and subagent orchestration. It supports text and image inputs within a 400,000-token context window, making it ideal for processing extensive visual datasets and large codebases in a single request. Designed for low-latency production environments, the model integrates with key API features including function calling, web search, and tool-based computer use, allowing it to assist in automated workflows that require navigating digital interfaces.

Compared to the previous GPT-5 mini, this version runs more than twice as fast while approaching the performance levels of the flagship GPT-5.4 on reasoning and coding benchmarks. While the larger GPT-5.4 introduces native, state-of-the-art computer-use capabilities, GPT-5.4 mini provides a scalable alternative for interpreting screenshots and reasoning over dense UI layouts. For vision tasks on Playground, it excels at extracting structured information from visual documents and assisting in agentic tasks that involve real-time interpretation of software interfaces alongside text.

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.8-27B is a dense vision-language model of roughly 27.78 billion parameters from Alibaba's Qwen team, built on the architectural foundation established by the Qwen3.5 generation. It takes interleaved text, image, and video input through an integrated vision encoder and produces text, covering document and chart understanding, visual question answering, front-end code generation from visual references, and agentic computer-use workflows. The decoder is a hybrid stack of 64 layers that repeats a pattern of three Gated DeltaNet linear-attention blocks, each followed by a feed-forward block, then one grouped-query full-attention block, so only a quarter of the layers maintain a conventional key-value cache. Native context length is 262,144 tokens.

Post-training targets long-horizon agentic work, and the model exposes per-request thinking control that lets callers switch reasoning traces on or off and choose a reasoning effort level. Multi-token prediction weights are trained alongside the main network for speculative decoding. Qwen reports improvements over Qwen3.6-27B on agentic and multimodal evaluations including Terminal-Bench 2.1, OSWorld-Verified, and SWE-bench Multimodal, with additional results on MathVision, CharXiv, and an internal Vision2Web suite.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, GPT-5.4 Mini performed better. It scores higher on 4 of the six vision tasks and averages 63.5% (#27 of 30) against 61.2% (#29 of 30) for Qwen3.8 27B. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark, Qwen3.8 27B leads with 54.5% against 16.1%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0018 per sample against $0.0030. GPT-5.4 Mini is priced at $0.75 per 1M input tokens and $4.50 per 1M output; Qwen3.8 27B is priced at $0.45 per 1M input tokens and $3.20 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

GPT-5.4 Mini is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 5.3s per inference against 7.3s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.