GPT-5.4 Mini vs Muse Ember
Muse Ember and GPT-5.4 Mini score 76.6% vs 53.2% averaged across five Vision Evals tasks (#16 and #55 of 67 models), so Muse Ember leads overall.
- Muse Ember wins all 5 tasks, with its widest lead on object detection (63.8% vs 15.8%).
- Muse Ember is about a quarter of the cost: $0.0009 vs $0.0034 overall average cost per sample.
- GPT-5.4 Mini is faster: 5.5s vs 6.1s per sample.
Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.
Compare GPT-5.4 Mini vs Muse Ember live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.
GPT-5.4 Mini vs Muse Ember on Vision Evals
Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.
GPT-5.4 Mini vs Muse Ember Comparison Table
Evals updated November 10, 2026Pricing updated November 10, 2026
| Property | GPT-5.4 Mini | Muse Ember |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | OpenAI | Meta |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Mar 2026 | Nov 2026 |
| Context Window | 400K | 1.0M |
| Parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | commercial use per vendor terms | commercial use per vendor terms |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.750 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $4.50 | $0.500 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Supported |
| Classification | Demo | Supported |
| Object Detection | Demo | Supported |
| OCR | Demo | Supported |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Supported |
| Model Features | ||
Both support 3 more features | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 53.2% | 76.6% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0034 | $0.0009 |
| Avg speed / sample | 5.51s | 6.08s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 15.8% ±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 15.3 to 16.1 | 63.8% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.3 to 64.3 |
| Object Detection (high) | 16.6% ±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 15.8 to 17.4 | 64.0% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.5 to 64.5 |
| Counting (low) | 58.6% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 56.8 to 60.8 | 79.7% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 81.1 |
| Counting (high) | 64.9% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.5 to 67.6 | 79.3% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 79.7 |
| Identification (low) | 83.3% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4 | 91.7% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8 |
| Identification (high) | 82.3% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 84.4 | 90.6% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 93.8 |
| OCR (low) | 51.1% | 69.5% |
| by category |
|
|
| OCR (high) | 55.8% | 70.5% |
| by category |
|
|
| Reasoning (low) | 57.0% ±3.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.3 to 60.9 | 78.2% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 76.8 to 79.5 |
| Reasoning (high) | 64.0% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.9 to 65.6 | 81.9% ±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.1 to 83.4 |
GPT-5.4 Mini vs Muse Ember: Overview
GPT-5.4 mini is a fast, cost-efficient model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, optimized for high-throughput workloads and subagent orchestration. It supports text and image inputs within a 400,000-token context window, making it ideal for processing extensive visual datasets and large codebases in a single request. Designed for low-latency production environments, the model integrates with key API features including function calling, web search, and tool-based computer use, allowing it to assist in automated workflows that require navigating digital interfaces.
Compared to the previous GPT-5 mini, this version runs more than twice as fast while approaching the performance levels of the flagship GPT-5.4 on reasoning and coding benchmarks. While the larger GPT-5.4 introduces native, state-of-the-art computer-use capabilities, GPT-5.4 mini provides a scalable alternative for interpreting screenshots and reasoning over dense UI layouts. For vision tasks on Playground, it excels at extracting structured information from visual documents and assisting in agentic tasks that involve real-time interpretation of software interfaces alongside text.
Muse Ember is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from Meta, released on November 9, 2026. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents and returns text. The Meta Model API serves it as muse-ember-1.0, with a 1,048,576-token context window and up to 524,288 output tokens. Reasoning effort is adjustable from minimal to max.
Meta positions Ember for repeated tasks within larger agent workflows: tool calls, routing, coding subtasks, and processing collections of images and documents. It can caption or sort photos and extract fields from records while a larger Muse model handles planning. Meta recommends Spark or Wonder for harder single-shot coding and knowledge-heavy problems. Ember is available as a hosted model; its weights are not publicly released.
Frequently Asked Questions
On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Muse Ember performed better. It scores higher on all five vision tasks and averages 76.6% (#16 of 67) against 53.2% (#55 of 67) for GPT-5.4 Mini. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.
No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark at low effort, Muse Ember leads with 63.8% against 15.8%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.
Muse Ember is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0009 per sample against $0.0034. GPT-5.4 Mini is priced at $0.75 per 1M input tokens and $4.50 per 1M output; Muse Ember is priced at $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.
GPT-5.4 Mini is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 5.5s per inference against 6.1s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.