Roboflow

GLM 5V Turbo vs Muse Spark 1.1

Compare GLM 5V Turbo and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.

Compare GLM 5V Turbo vs Muse Spark 1.1 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
Z.aiGLM 5V Turbo
Run to compare this model.
MetaMuse Spark 1.1
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GLM 5V Turbo vs Muse Spark 1.1 on Vision Evals

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on all six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 74.8% to 31.8%.

Overall, GLM 5V Turbo averages 65.3% (#25 of 33) against 79.3% (#7 of 33) for Muse Spark 1.1.

GLM 5V Turbo is both cheaper ($0.0031 vs $0.0069 per sample) and faster (6.3s vs 11.4s per sample).

GLM 5V TurboMuse Spark 1.1

GLM 5V Turbo vs Muse Spark 1.1 Comparison Table

Evals updated August 26, 2026Pricing updated August 26, 2026

PropertyGLM 5V TurboMuse Spark 1.1
OrganizationZ.aiMeta
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateApr 2026Jul 2026
Context Window200K1.0M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.20$1.25
Output $/1M$4.00$4.25
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
65.3%
79.3%
Avg cost / sample$0.0031$0.0069
Avg speed / sample6.35s11.40s
By task
Object Detection
56.5%
$0.0052
58.4%
$0.010
Counting
48.6%
$0.0017
75.7%
$0.0043
Identification
84.4%
$0.0015
87.5%
$0.0032
OCR
89.3%
$0.0030
92.5%
$0.0063
Data Extraction
81.4%
$0.0018
86.6%
$0.0031
Reasoning (low)
31.8%
$0.0017
74.8%
$0.0065
Reasoning (high)
49.7%
$0.0069
76.2%
$0.013

GLM 5V Turbo vs Muse Spark 1.1: Overview

GLM 5V Turbo

GLM-5V-Turbo is a native multimodal model from Z.ai that extends the GLM family with joint image, video, and text input aimed at vision-centered coding and agent workflows. The model reads screenshots, design drafts, document layouts, and interface captures and generates runnable code from them, covering tasks such as turning a visual design into a working front end, diagnosing rendering and layout defects from screen captures, and operating graphical user interfaces during long-horizon agent runs. It accepts roughly 200,000 input tokens and can emit up to 131,072 output tokens in a single response, which supports sessions that hold specifications, source files, logs, and visual references at the same time.

Training includes a joint reinforcement learning stage spanning more than 30 tasks simultaneously, an approach Z.ai describes as a way to counter the trade-off in which improving visual recognition degrades programming ability and the reverse. Reported evaluations cover pure-text coding on the backend, frontend, and repository exploration tracks of CC-Bench-V2, together with agent execution suites such as PinchBench, ClawEval, and ZClawBench, indicating that text coding behavior is retained after visual input is added.

Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is a natively multimodal reasoning model from Meta Superintelligence Labs, released on July 9, 2026, as a significant upgrade to the original Muse Spark. The model accepts text, image, video, PDF, and audio as input and produces text output. It operates with a 1-million-token context window (1,048,576 tokens per the Meta Model API documentation) and is designed specifically for agentic tasks that require planning, tool use, computer use, and multi-agent orchestration. The model runs in a "Thinking" mode, where adjustable reasoning effort is applied before generating a response. It can function both as a main agent gathering context, forming plans, and delegating to parallel subagents and as a subagent that adheres to assigned tasks and escalates when needed. It is trained to decide autonomously when to write automation scripts versus interact directly with a user interface.

Muse Spark 1.1 supports a range of multimodal capabilities including visual perception, image and video captioning, visual-to-code generation, and document analysis. The model was evaluated under Meta's Advanced AI Scaling Framework across frontier risk categories including chemical and biological threats, cybersecurity, and loss-of-control scenarios. Parameter count, architecture details, and training data composition are not publicly disclosed. The model is proprietary and closed-weight, accessible to consumers through the Meta AI app and to developers via the Meta Model API, which launched in public preview alongside this release.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Muse Spark 1.1 performed better. It scores higher on all six vision tasks and averages 79.3% (#7 of 33) against 65.3% (#25 of 33) for GLM 5V Turbo. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals Reasoning benchmark at low effort, Muse Spark 1.1 leads with 74.8% against 31.8%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

GLM 5V Turbo is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0031 per sample against $0.0069. GLM 5V Turbo is priced at $1.20 per 1M input tokens and $4.00 per 1M output; Muse Spark 1.1 is priced at $1.25 per 1M input tokens and $4.25 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

GLM 5V Turbo is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 6.3s per inference against 11.4s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.