Roboflow

GLM 5V Turbo vs Grok 4.5

Compare GLM 5V Turbo and Grok 4.5 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.

Compare GLM 5V Turbo vs Grok 4.5 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
Z.aiGLM 5V Turbo
Run to compare this model.
GrokGrok 4.5
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GLM 5V Turbo vs Grok 4.5 on Vision Evals

Grok 4.5 scores higher on 4 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where GLM 5V Turbo leads 56.5% to 18.0%.

Overall, GLM 5V Turbo averages 65.3% (#25 of 33) against 64.3% (#26 of 33) for Grok 4.5.

GLM 5V Turbo is both cheaper ($0.0031 vs $0.0077 per sample) and faster (6.3s vs 14.3s per sample).

GLM 5V TurboGrok 4.5

GLM 5V Turbo vs Grok 4.5 Comparison Table

Evals updated August 26, 2026Pricing updated August 26, 2026

PropertyGLM 5V TurboGrok 4.5
OrganizationZ.aiSpaceXAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateApr 2026Jul 2026
Context Window200K500K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.20$2.00
Output $/1M$4.00$6.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
65.3%
64.3%
Avg cost / sample$0.0031$0.0077
Avg speed / sample6.35s14.33s
By task
Object Detection
56.5%
$0.0052
18.0%
$0.0100
Counting
48.6%
$0.0017
55.4%
$0.0065
Identification
84.4%
$0.0015
78.1%
$0.0045
OCR
89.3%
$0.0030
92.5%
$0.0065
Data Extraction
81.4%
$0.0018
83.5%
$0.0044
Reasoning (low)
31.8%
$0.0017
58.3%
$0.0076
Reasoning (high)
49.7%
$0.0069
59.6%
$0.011

GLM 5V Turbo vs Grok 4.5: Overview

GLM 5V Turbo

GLM-5V-Turbo is a native multimodal model from Z.ai that extends the GLM family with joint image, video, and text input aimed at vision-centered coding and agent workflows. The model reads screenshots, design drafts, document layouts, and interface captures and generates runnable code from them, covering tasks such as turning a visual design into a working front end, diagnosing rendering and layout defects from screen captures, and operating graphical user interfaces during long-horizon agent runs. It accepts roughly 200,000 input tokens and can emit up to 131,072 output tokens in a single response, which supports sessions that hold specifications, source files, logs, and visual references at the same time.

Training includes a joint reinforcement learning stage spanning more than 30 tasks simultaneously, an approach Z.ai describes as a way to counter the trade-off in which improving visual recognition degrades programming ability and the reverse. Reported evaluations cover pure-text coding on the backend, frontend, and repository exploration tracks of CC-Bench-V2, together with agent execution suites such as PinchBench, ClawEval, and ZClawBench, indicating that text coding behavior is retained after visual input is added.

Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5 is a proprietary reasoning model from SpaceXAI (xAI) that accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text, with a 500,000 token context window. xAI positions it as a model for coding, agentic software work, and knowledge tasks, and states it was trained in the company's Memphis data centers on datasets spanning science, engineering, and mathematics. Its reinforcement learning stage covers hundreds of thousands of multi step software engineering tasks scored by automated checks and model based grading, and training is reported to have run on tens of thousands of NVIDIA GB300 GPUs using an asynchronous scheme in which multi hour agentic rollouts continue while learning proceeds in parallel, targeting long horizon autonomous operation rather than single turn inference.

For vision, the model consumes JPEG and PNG images in any order relative to text prompts, covering visual question answering, description of chart and document imagery, and reading text rendered inside a scene. Reasoning effort is configurable, and the model supports function calling and structured outputs, so image inputs can be interleaved with tool calls inside agent loops. xAI has not published a technical report, architecture details, or parameter count, and reported mixture of experts sizing figures come from secondary coverage rather than official documentation.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Grok 4.5 performed better. It scores higher on 4 of the six vision tasks and averages 64.3% (#26 of 33) against 65.3% (#25 of 33) for GLM 5V Turbo. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

Yes. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark, GLM 5V Turbo leads with 56.5% against 18.0%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

GLM 5V Turbo is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0031 per sample against $0.0077. GLM 5V Turbo is priced at $1.20 per 1M input tokens and $4.00 per 1M output; Grok 4.5 is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $6.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

GLM 5V Turbo is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 6.3s per inference against 14.3s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.