GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Compare GLM 5.3 Flash and Qwen3.6 35B A3B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.
Compare GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B on Vision Evals
Qwen3.6 35B A3B scores higher on 4 of the six Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Object Detection, where Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads 56.1% to 33.1%.
Overall, GLM 5.3 Flash averages 66.3% (#32 of 52) against 71.7% (#20 of 52) for Qwen3.6 35B A3B.
GLM 5.3 Flash is both cheaper ($0.0002 vs $0.0012 per sample) and faster (6.8s vs 27.0s per sample).
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B Comparison Table
Evals updated September 3, 2026Pricing updated September 4, 2026
| Property | GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Z.ai | Qwen |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Aug 2026 | Apr 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 262K |
| Parameters | 320B total, 18B active | 35B total, 3B active |
| License | MIT | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.075 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $0.250 | $0.900 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Phrase Grounding | ||
| Video Classification | ||
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 66.3% | 71.7% |
| Quantizationsself-hosted | ||
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0002 | $0.0012 |
| Avg speed / sample | 6.78s | 26.97s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | 33.1% | 56.1% |
| Counting | 55.4% | 67.6% |
| Identification | 84.4% | 84.4% |
| OCR | 90.6% | 81.6% |
| Data Extraction | 83.5% | 84.7% |
| Reasoning (low) | 51.0% | 55.6% |
| Reasoning (high) | 59.6% | – |
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B: Overview
GLM-5.3-Flash is the first natively multimodal model in Z.ai's GLM-5 series, a mixture-of-experts transformer with roughly 320 billion total parameters and 18 billion activated per token. It routes each token through 8 of 288 experts across 45 language layers that interleave KDA linear attention with sparse multi-head latent attention, and pairs them with a 24-layer vision encoder that handles image and video input. The checkpoint declares a maximum context length of 1,048,576 tokens, ships in native FP8, and includes a multi-token prediction draft layer for speculative decoding. Z.ai reports that the hybrid attention design reduces attention computation by 3.01x and KV cache size by 4.44x relative to GLM-5.3.
The model starts from a newly trained base built on a 30 trillion token multimodal pre-training corpus and adopts Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections to improve scaling efficiency. Vision is integrated into the coding and agent loop, so the model can inspect interfaces, rendered output, and images while operating across code, browsers, and graphical user interfaces. Z.ai reports scores of 84.3 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, 63.4 on DeepSWE 1.1, 55.3 on Humanity's Last Exam with tools, and 48.8 on AutomationBench, and the model exposes low, high, and max thinking modes.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) multimodal language model developed by the Qwen team at Alibaba Group. It carries 35 billion total parameters but activates only approximately 3 billion per forward pass via a learned routing mechanism, giving it the representational capacity of a large dense model at a fraction of the inference compute. The model is natively multimodal, processing images, documents, and video alongside text as a core architectural capability rather than an add-on. It supports a native context window of 262,144 tokens, extensible up to 1,010,000 tokens via YaRN. A key design feature is the unified thinking/non-thinking mode framework: users can switch between deliberate chain-of-thought reasoning and fast direct responses within a single model, and a "thinking preservation" option retains reasoning context across multi-turn agentic workflows to reduce redundant computation.
The model is specifically optimized for agentic coding tasks, including repository-level reasoning, frontend workflow generation, multi-step tool use, and MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration. On SWE-bench Verified it scores 73.4%, on Terminal-Bench 2.0 it scores 51.5%, and on MCPMark it scores 37.0%. For vision-language tasks it achieves 92.0 on RefCOCO, 89.9 on OmniDocBench 1.5, and 83.7 on VideoMMMU. The model also supports Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) for speculative decoding. All Qwen3.6 open-weight models are released under the Apache 2.0 license.