Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Grok 4.6
Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B and Grok 4.6 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Open Prompt, Object Detection, and Classification.
Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Grok 4.6 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Grok 4.6 on Vision Evals
Grok 4.6 scores higher on 3 of the 4 Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Counting, where Grok 4.6 leads 65.8% to 43.2%.
Overall, Gemma 4 26B A4B averages 54.1% (#50 of 63) against 59.1% (#36 of 63) for Grok 4.6.
Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper ($0.0019 vs $0.011 per sample), while Grok 4.6 is faster (19.3s vs 27.8s per sample).
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Grok 4.6 Comparison Table
Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 17, 2026
| Property | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | SpaceXAI | |
| Category | open | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Apr 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Context Window | 256K | 500K |
| Parameters | 25.2B | Unknown |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | free for commercial use | commercial use per vendor terms |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.068 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $0.225 | $6.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Image Tagging | Supported | Supported |
| Multi-Label Classification | Supported | Supported |
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | Supported | Supported |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | Supported | Supported |
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | Supported | Supported |
| Multimodal Vision | Supported | Supported |
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 54.1% 4/5 tasks | 59.1% |
| Quantizationsself-hosted | ||
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0019 | $0.011 |
| Avg speed / sample | 27.84s | 19.32s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 44.2% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 43.5 to 44.8 | 23.8% ±2.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 20.2 to 25.9 |
| Object Detection (high) | – | 24.0% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 23.1 to 25.1 |
| Counting (low) | 43.2% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 41.9 to 46.0 | 65.8% ±4.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.2 to 70.3 |
| Counting (high) | – | 56.8% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.4 to 58.1 |
| Identification (low) | 81.3% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 84.4 | 84.4% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 87.5 |
| Identification (high) | – | 85.4% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 87.5 |
| OCR (low) | – | 60.6% |
| by category |
| |
| OCR (high) | – | 61.2% |
| by category |
| |
| Reasoning (low) | 47.7% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 45.0 to 49.0 | 61.1% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.6 to 62.3 |
| Reasoning (high) | – | 63.8% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.3 to 66.2 |
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Grok 4.6: Overview
Gemma 4 26B A4B is the Mixture-of-Experts variant in Google's Gemma 4 family, with 25.2B total parameters but only 3.8B active per token. Built from the same Gemini 3 research as the 31B dense sibling and released as open weights under the Apache 2.0 license, it supports a 256K token context window with text and image input and configurable thinking mode. The "A4B" in the name refers to its approximately 4B active parameters. The MoE design makes it significantly faster at inference than the dense 31B, running nearly as fast as a 4B-parameter model while delivering roughly 97% of the dense model's quality.
For vision tasks, the 26B A4B shares the same multimodal capabilities as the 31B image understanding with variable aspect ratios and resolutions, and structured bounding box output for UI element detection. The tradeoff versus the 31B dense model is a small quality reduction in exchange for much faster inference and lower hardware requirements, fitting in 18GB of VRAM at 4-bit quantization. It ranked #6 among open models on the Arena AI text leaderboard at launch.
Grok 4.6 is a proprietary reasoning model from xAI aimed at long-running agentic workflows, coding, and knowledge work. It accepts text and image input and returns text, with a 500,000 token context window and a knowledge cutoff of February 1, 2026. The model exposes an adjustable reasoning budget with low, medium, high, and xhigh settings, where high is the default, and it supports function calling, structured outputs, web and X search, and code execution as documented tool behaviors. Its visual capability covers interpreting images supplied alongside text prompts, which places it in the visual question answering and document understanding family, and it can also return object detection boxes as text coordinates when prompted.
xAI characterizes Grok 4.6 as the result of an extended post-training run over the Grok 4.5 lineage rather than a new pretrained base. The described recipe combines curated model-generated reasoning and technical data, engineering data, a revised optimizer, regenerated supervised fine-tuning trajectories, and reinforcement learning across agent environments spanning knowledge work, coding, kernel optimization, web development, and computer-aided design. Parameter count and architecture specifics are not disclosed. Independent measurement from Artificial Analysis places the model at 61 on its Intelligence Index, five points above Grok 4.5.