Roboflow

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5 Nano

Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-5 Nano side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Open Prompt, Object Detection, and Classification.

Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5 Nano live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-5 Nano
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5 Nano: Overview

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B is the Mixture-of-Experts variant in Google's Gemma 4 family, with 25.2B total parameters but only 3.8B active per token. Built from the same Gemini 3 research as the 31B dense sibling and released as open weights under the Apache 2.0 license, it supports a 256K token context window with text and image input and configurable thinking mode. The "A4B" in the name refers to its approximately 4B active parameters. The MoE design makes it significantly faster at inference than the dense 31B, running nearly as fast as a 4B-parameter model while delivering roughly 97% of the dense model's quality.

For vision tasks, the 26B A4B shares the same multimodal capabilities as the 31B image understanding with variable aspect ratios and resolutions, and structured bounding box output for UI element detection. The tradeoff versus the 31B dense model is a small quality reduction in exchange for much faster inference and lower hardware requirements, fitting in 18GB of VRAM at 4-bit quantization. It ranked #6 among open models on the Arena AI text leaderboard at launch.

GPT-5 Nano

GPT-5 Nano, released by OpenAI on August 7, 2025, is the smallest and most cost-efficient model in the GPT-5 family. Like its larger counterparts, it is multimodal—accepting text and images, supporting tool use, structured outputs, and reasoning—but it is optimized for speed, low latency, and affordability. It features input and output token limits of roughly 272K and 128K tokens respectively, enabling large-context processing even at its compact scale. Its knowledge cutoff is around May 2024, slightly earlier than the full GPT-5 model.

GPT-5 Nano is well-suited for high-volume or cost-sensitive deployments such as mobile apps, embedded AI systems, or rapid-response APIs. While it offers less depth on complex reasoning and coding tasks compared to GPT-5 Mini or Pro, it retains core multimodal and agentic capabilities, making it an attractive option where efficiency and scale matter more than maximum performance.

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5 Nano Comparison Table

PropertyGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-5 Nano
OrganizationGoogleOpenAI
Categoryopenclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateApr 2026Aug 2025
Context Window256K400K
Parameters25.2B
LicenseApache 2.0Proprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.060$0.050
Output $/1M$0.330$0.400
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
68.66%
58.21%
Avg Response Time30.23s6.58s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2941.8K
Median output tokens214591
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001$0.0003
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
86.7%(13/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
66.7%(6/9)
Object Counting
10%(1/10)
0%(0/10)
Object Understanding
85.7%(12/14)
64.3%(9/14)
Spatial Understanding
68.4%(13/19)
57.9%(11/19)
OCR
Overall Score
83.84%
69%
Avg Response Time12.05s6.15s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens290122
Median output tokens42539
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark<$0.0001$0.0002
Focused Scene OCR
85.9%(85/99)
64.6%(64/99)
Handwritten Math
50%(5/10)
40%(4/10)
License Plate Recognition
93.3%(28/30)
83.3%(25/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
70%(21/30)
VQA & Extraction
83.3%(50/60)
73.3%(44/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology